What sexual thing did Eric do to Donna that was unpleasant? - That 70's Show

[Darren_Garrison]

@NBrandyWine

Finger in front and the back that’s why she freaked out. I freaked out the first time my husband did this. He should’ve asked or described to her what he wanted to do first before just trying something new like that.

But was it the shocker or the spocker?

[bizerta]

@Kent_Clark

The Venus Butterfly was the secret invention of a man who was being prosecuted for bigamy. Stuart (the middle-aged kinda fat tax lawyer) asked the guy what his secret was for holding on to multiple wives and the guy taught it to him.

The show never explained what it was, but they did show the too-good-for-Stuart girlfriend curled up next to him in bed asking “Can we do that again?” …

Michael Tucker and Jill Eikenberry (the actors who were in that scene) are married in real life. They were on a talk show about two years after the Venus Butterfly episode aired. The said they were frequently asked to describe the Venus Butterfly. “It’s fiction, folks.” No explanation was ever made. I’m assuming the same thing for the 70’s show.

Today, if one googles Venus Butterfly, someone has come up with the assumption that it was oral, but no one has ever presented any evidence that it was anything other than a made-up sex act.

[Kent_Clark]

Good news! Canadiansexacts.org is still a live site.

[EdelweissPirate]

I realize this thread is a zombie, but:
There’s a term of art for this in the entertainment industry, popularized by Alfred Hitchcock: a MacGuffin.
Hitchcock popularized the term in the late 1930s he described the MacGuffin concept thusly:

@Alfred Hitchock

It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men on a train. One man says, ‘What’s that package up there in the baggage rack?’ And the other answers, ‘Oh, that’s a MacGuffin’. The first one asks, ‘What’s a MacGuffin?’ ‘Well,’ the other man says, ‘it’s an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.’ The first man says, ‘But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,’ and the other one answers, ‘Well then, that’s no MacGuffin!’ So you see that a MacGuffin is actually nothing at all.

(Quote taken from link in post)

The sex act in question is a textbook MacGuffin.

[Bryan_Ekers]

It turns out he didn’t like it either, hence they called it “the noodle incident”.

[Trancephalic]

I think it involves a knuckle and a counterclockwise swirl