I believe that illustrates that we can coexist if we don’t get in each other’s faces. Which includes bumper stickers and walking around Wal-Mart with firearms.
If one side has to refrain from posting bumper stickers to get the other side to stop carrying guns in Wal-Mart, the other side is a bigger part of the problem.
The other day, I saw a truck with “TRUMP 2024 - F*CK YOUR FEELINGS” in big letters. How should I establish a dialogue with that person?
If you’re someone who listens to reason and can change your mind when shown that you’re wrong, you may be projecting when you think everyone is like that.
You’ll start with that. Then it will be “don’t put signs for democrats on your lawn”. Then it will be “don’t advertise for democrats in any form”. Then it will be “no democrats in the primaries” Then it will be “no democrats allowed in the elections”.
Slippery slope argument for sure, but I don’t see Republicans giving you ONE SINGLE INCH. Ever. It’s a one way street with them. They hypocrisy about this does not even enter their minds.
You’ll give and give and compromise and compromise until you have nothing. That’s the end game for them.
I don’t see how you figure that.
Precedent is, however, one reason they fear gun control. If we won’t let them walk through Wal-Mart with a weapon, the next step will to prevent them from keeping one at home.
See, we do think alike in some ways.
I had a epiphany a few years back: Trickle-down economics is to the Right what Communism used to be to the Left. An economic theory that sounds good in principle, but which fails all the time, because real people just don’t act in the manner the theory thinks they do.
The difference is, most left-wing people have given up on pure communism, while most right-wing people still worship trickle-down.
When was the left adoring communism the was the right adores trickle-down economics? You can find an equivalence between the right trying to stop members of the communist party from working to make a living and feed their families like the way the left tried to stop people who supported trickle down economics from working and to make a living and feed their families, except the left never did that.
Is trickle down still a thing? He should have called it “flow down economics”, but then still bought it.
Tri-Polar orders a yacht, and my hardware store sells a whole bunch of nuts and bolts to the company making it.
I only call them “deplorable” because they keep calling me “faggot.”
It’s nice that, as a straight white person, you were able to have a friendly interaction with another straight white person. Folks that don’t fit into those categories have a very different experience of these “normal people” than you do.
When Clinton said that that was about half of them, they all got offended, and then all started calling themselves “deplorables”. They ARE self-identified bigots.
Of course they do, but the left wing flawed idea of 100 years ago was a foolish belief in socialism that was never manifested in the economy. The right wing ideas of that time was laissez faire economics which sent the country’s economy into a tailspin. Comparing the left wing flirtation with pure socialism a century ago to the embrace of trickle down economics by modern conservatives is absurd.
Not in our economy, no, but it did manifest in a lot of other places, and lots of Westerners held those places up as examples to be followed, even as they lagged behind the West.
Or did you forget about that whole Cold War thingy?