Long story short: Husband is out of state on a work related business trip. He becomes violently ill and thinks he’s having a heart attack. (Back story: He’s young (45) and in really good shape, but his father, grandfather and 3 of his 4 uncles didn’t live to see 50 because of heart issues.) He is rushed to the hospital, where he spends 36 hours as an interim (not in-patient but not quite out-patient) patient. After a battery of tests, it’s determined that he suffered a panic attack brought on by stress. (He’s a stock broker.)
Insurance was notified by me a few hours after he’s admitted to the ER. They advise me to just “let the doctors do their job.”
Now the bills are coming in, and while the insurance has paid the bulk of the bills, they are denying a few of the individual bills, saying that they were out of network and not authorized. Now they are billing us directly for the services. Our insurance card says right on it that for emergencies, go to the nearest emergency room. That’s what he did. We assume that everything they do in the hospital is medically necessary and directly related to this emergency.
So far the “denied” bills are for $260, 345, and 420.
Note: If it’s worth anything, they presented him a paper that said he’d be responsible for payment, but he never signed it, and they never asked for it. In fact, we took the paper home with us.
So. Would you pay them? Ignore them? Appeal them? Ask husband’s company to pay them because he was out-of-town due to his job? Try to negotiate to lower the bills?
On the one hand, I don’t want to stiff anyone. They took good care of him. On the other, we pay damn good money ($850/mo.) to get decent insurance coverage. And it’s not like he planned to have a panic attack out-of-network. And I’ve seen how the insurance companies reduced all the submitted bill by 1/3 or more – why should “uninsured” people pay an inflated, unadjusted rate?