This is why I thought Wikipedia may not solve everything. They refer to themselves as “the sect” in every single one of their LP titles. And most of the footnotes and cites have “The” in them. Looks like most of them per wiki. They were very much calling themselves “The sect”
No.
Quoth the wiki: “Barrett created the name on the spur of the moment when he discovered that another band, also called the Tea Set, were to perform at one of their gigs. The name is derived from the given names of two blues musicians whose Piedmont blues records Barrett had in his collection, Pink Anderson and Floyd Council.”
I find it -disturbing- that the first thing through your mind is a dildo. Freudian slips can be quite revealing!
If Big Bands count, Wikipedia has a list that goes back a century with plenty of names without “The”: List of big bands - Wikipedia Nighthawks Orchestra did hot jazz in 1919, precursor of R&R in some way: Nighthawks Orchestra - Wikipedia and there are many more.
I just have to say that ever since I started collecting MP3s I ignore the word “The” in the artists name, with only a few exceptions. I would think that lists of bands on the net may be doing that too. They are alphabetical in some way. They are explaining the connect between a number of related names.
Also posessives kind of take the place of the indefinite article, to me.
On a related note, I’ve noticed that Sirius XM sometimes displays the band names without the “The”, even if they are definitely a part of the band name, like “The Who”. But it’s inconsistent, even with that band.
On another related, more grammatical note, there’s the issue that something the “the” in the band’s name gets treated as semi-optional when it would lead to constructions like “The ‘The Beatles’ Channel”. It makes sense to use just one “the” and let it be ambiguous as to which “the” is being removed.
Also I just realized that they don’t list any “The…” names under “T” except for one that is a T initialed name after “The.” It’s a list with the Thes edited out.