The rule around here is attack the post, not the user. Since this appears to be a pattern of behavior on your part and not a one-off event, instead of a note this is an official warning for attacking users outside of the Pit. Further attacks on users may result in a loss of posting privileges.
Moderator Note
Do not attack the staff. This is also a warnable offense. If you wish to discuss the moderation of this site or the moderators themselves, feel free to open a thread in ATMB, but keep the discussion respectful as per ATMB rules.
You began each paragraph with spaces to indent. Discourse interprets this differently than our old vBulletin software. I fixed the formatting in the first post and a couple of subsequent posts, but I don’t have the time to go through every post in that thread to fix the remaining formatting errors.
So you are saying a deliberate detouring from the subject at hand by inferring I was “a pig in the mud” is not an attack?..
I am the foremost researcher in the world on this subject…I’ve done two public radio shows in major cities discussing my evidence…Your site called my research a “lunatic theory”…
By definition a coroner is not a researcher…The coroner who did the autopsy was England’s best, Dr Donald Teare…The Chief Coroner who oversaw Teare was Dr Gavin Thurston, the head of the London Coroner’s Office…In an interview with reporter Jack Meehan Thurston said “Mr Hendrix’s stomach contents at autopsy showed he had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…By saying this Thurston condemned the autopsy because, as Chief Coroner, by definition he was required to then process why Jimi only had a trace blood alcohol amount while being witnessed by the Chief Coroner as having a “stomach full of red wine”…That stomach full of wine should have produced a commensurate blood alcohol content…It was Thuston’s job description to figure out why it didn’t…This is proof of malfeasance at the least and proof of a cover-up at the worst…
Forensically, a stomach full of red wine with no ensuing blood alcohol content is also proof of drowning in wine because the only way you could have a stomach full of wine with no associated blood alcohol content is if the lungs were drowned by that same wine causing the heart to stop, therefore causing the intestines to not absorb the wine…
C’mon, gang, you’ve got to admit that reading a “favorite theories” thread, when suddenly the perfect example of a theorist shows up, is a cool sort of self-referential cosmic convergence…
I’ll concede that “Hendrix was drowned in wine” is not the most lunatic theory about Hendrix’s death. That honor probably goes to Wellaware1, who has incontrovertible evidence, including a dorsal hand vein match, to prove that Hendrix faked his death and became Morgan Freeman.
“Do I need to go on? No, not really, because if you have any ability to critically think and apply common sense you know for a fact with this scientific evidence as well as the supporting proof of his spouse, know what I am saying is FACT. If you claim to disagree, even after looking at the evidence in front of you, it shows you are thinking in a conditioned state and/or are benefiting from this lie somehow.”
Excuse me, but I need to know how to benefit from not believing Jimi is Morgan. Can I collect from George Soros (when I stop by his compound to get my cash for not believing Donald is still President)?
The first two Pauls are dead, but the third one is holding up well, despite the efforts of two of the Beatles to expose the conspiracy…but he took care of that problem.
