I haven’t read through the whole thread, but my personal opinion is that I know that when a human is good, making good, she has nothing to fear, whatever happens later.
If something happens.
That, I would say is logical.
I can not understand that people, in different religions, say:
“Our Religion is the only one. Those that does not believe like we do, are doomed.”
It can’t be that life, (or literally after-life), is a big guessing game, which card (religion) to choose. And we do not even possess every card.
There is always millions of people that have never heard of Your/Our religion, what ever that is, and could thus not choose it.
If a person has been helping people his whole life and never harmed anyone…, done what his culture think is the rightful things to do…
Then one day he dies, and do You really think that there is a voice saying: “You should go downstairs!”
That is why I never believe in those God/religions of human creation, because these Gods seems to be very egoistic.
(If You do not believe in (worship) me, go to Hell-type).
And that is for me proof enough, about that the human created God.
These people with some beliefs and need to go to a certain house, to do some certain rituals? (Yes, every church or whatever The House of God is called, has rituals, just imagine people with a skirt made of reeds, doing those rituals, and You get the right picture).
When we vote, and some candidate begins to speak about that “we need to help the starving people, on the other side of the globe, that we need to push our money there…”
Well, in a Christian country he will be politically dead, and the more there is believers, the faster.
I do not know about the other countries, with different beliefs, but the Northern Hemisphere, we the Beautiful Whities are acting like this.
So much about what we have understood of the whole thing.
And these guys (that has actually voted against helping) could go to heaven, and the guys that have never heard of “The Right God”, but been helping their communities all their lives, should go to hell?
Because a book, this book or that book, says so?
If I had a God, I believe that I could talk with him in my toilet and there would never be any need for rituals and to build houses for Him.
If I look at Christianity, I can understand the main thought of the New Testament.
But the fact, among about thousand others, that in Christian churches there is always gold, in clothes, in the interior and so on, is just showing a historical fact, that “the church” has been “dazzeling” the poor people and filled it with amaze and wonder…, in order to “get their souls”, to be a part of the power-structure and sometimes in history being the power-structure.
All this is enough of proof to me that the God does not exist there, if at all.
If we mean that God exists when we get a higher moral, by the years passing by, then he does exist. That God lives inside us.
Unfortunately, that that God promise us nothing in the future and he does not need to, because the moral is not a tool of “how to control us”, as the man-made God is.
My “God” is pore in nature, when I am poor in nature. When I do good deeds, He does good deeds.
So the moral/conscience is a “good God” or a “satan” that dies when I die. And after that there is nothing, or if there is, there is only what I have chosen; the good or the bad.
If my thought are good or bad when I’m dying…
If that fraction of second feels like an eternity, so be it, but it has nothing to do with the “Church (or whatever) of Power” = the God interpreted/invented by man, for its own purposes.
And there will absolutely not be a guy asking questions, or some choir singing, unless I imagine so. (Stress on the word “imagine”).
If God is imagined, is he still a God?
So the “work in this life, do not complain”, (while we are using the power here on the earth), “and You will get everything in next life…”, is just a “whack” in order to control people.
I would say that logically thinking there can not be that kind of God that the priests (or whatever titles they use) have invented for us.
I think the OP is about God even if it does not say so.
So how to define God?