There are a number of dopers that have latched on to the word plutocracy, claiming it’s what we have now in the US.
Today I was looking through the voting slips I get as a stock holder and it got me thinking: what would plutocracy look like if the US formally adopted it at the federal level?
Right now we have a system of one vote per citizen. What if instead we changed to it make the number of votes proportional to wealth or income?
To clean it up a bit, I propose the following: one vote for every $1000 you pay to personal income tax (split evenly and rounded up for married filing jointly). And like the Senate system, I would then allow one vote for everyone that files. And it would be based on the previous 3 years of filing to avoid people pumping up their taxes every four years. So everyone would still get one vote, but those that pay more taxes get more votes. I call this the, “You live under my roof so you follow my rules” style of government.
Obviously this is never going to happen (or already has) so I don’t know that we need to debate whether or not this is a good idea.
What I’m really curious to know is how the political landscape would change, and how the current political environment would alter in response.
I think power will shift towards upper middle class and away from lower income groups, as well as dramatically reducing the power of seniors and students towards the higher earning 40-55 year olds.
My *perception *has always been that low income urban vote [D], low income rural vote [R]. But then I get the sense urban upper middle class tends to be more conservative, and I have no idea what upper middle class rural looks like if it even exists.
Thoughts?