For anyone who is not familiar with the OP’s particular brand of crazy, you should definitely take a read through thiscurrent thread. It’s full of some really hilarious nutbaggery!
How hard is it to read this?
Bullshit, read her other threads, if the girl isn’t Roma, and they are not intending to marry there is no way in hell that ZPG considers her suitable to even associate with her family.
She wants everything to go back to the middle ages when the Roma stayed exclusively within their own community.
In fact, I will not. The chance of me believing anything the OP says is vanishingly small.
I don’t believe ANYTHING this lunatic says, and if you do, I suggest you do a forum search for her poster name and what she’s previously posted about sex-related issues.
She believes that it’s morally justified to kill a pregnant woman in order to prevent that woman from getting child support from the father of her unborn child.
She believes that a man who wants to shake hands with a woman is a rapist, and a woman who agrees to shake hands with a man is a whore.
She believes that there are adoptive parents lurking in the bushes waiting to jump out and grab the biological children of her clan and force them into abusive adoptive relationships, and that adoptive parents who let their adoptive children call them “Mom” and “Dad” are committing child abuse.
And OBVIOUSLY, if she doesn’t say what state she lives in, we don’t know which laws about consent apply to this supposed situation, do we? Especially since you admit that it’s legal in 38 states.
Given this lunatic’s faint grasp of reality, I would be willing to bet she has NO IDEA whether or not it’s legal or illegal in her state.
Quite frankly, I believe that she’s…not truthful…about the posts she’s made.
The legal age of consent where I live is 17 which means in the eyes of certain people (some of whom could be with the DA’s office) the girl cannot legally consent to sex and any sexual activity she engages in is rape. One can hope an aggressive ADD would not want to pursue a statutory rape case where both participants are 16, but that’s all one can do, hope. There is no guarantee. Furthermore, in a couple of months, when Nephew X is 17, and if they are still fooling around, statutory rape charges become even easier to lay on him. It’s ticking time-bomb in which my choices are live with the risk of the girl’s family filing charges any moment or someone else who is a mandatory reporter for sexual abuse (because legally until she is 17 any sexual activity she engages is a crime) finding out and informing the police or filing charges myself that Nephew X has been a victim of underage sex.
It’s probably Illinois, based on everything she’s written, and the makeup of the board. Why is that far-fetched?
Or you could mind your own business, ZPG, and realize that teenagers fuck, and have fucked since the beginning of time, and the likelihood of any of your paranoid fantasies about rape accusations are significantly less likely to occur in real life than in your fevered brain. I guarantee that the number of teenagers being wrongfully prosecuted for sex is FAR less than the number of teenagers who are actually fucking. Your desire to throw this girl under the bus is abhorrent, but totally in keeping with your evil.
Dude, seriously, I don’t know why you’ve appointed yourself as her legal protector, but regardless of where it is (and she only JUST NOW verified it’s in Illinois), her stories are not to be trusted. You’d know that if you paid attention to her posting history.
Huh.
What did your attorney say?
Yeah, I’ve been in on almost all of them.
My nephew is the boy. I’m paranoid that some overly aggressive prosecutor will decide he or she needs to be tough on sex with underage girls and my nephew will get railroaded because of this. If I have to throw one of them to the wolves, heck yes, it will be the girl.
Yes, because district attorneys in Illinois are so hard-up for work that they’ll actively seek out instances of teenagers fucking solely for the purpose of prosecuting the participants for consensual sex.
Seriously, hon? Nobody outside of your family gives a goddamn about what you and your family are doing.
What fucking prosecutor goes around looking for underage teens having sex with one another? You realize that the only knowledge said fictitious prosecutor would have of the incident would exist only if you made an issue of it. Thus satisfying your rape prosecution fantasies after all. You’re a danger to society.
HOW the hell, can you extrapolate that I would be filing a false accusation of rape from this? My nephew is 16. That’s below the age of consent where we live which means he legally cannot consent to sexual activity.
On the other hand, lawyering up will probably only encourage retaliatory legal actions from the girl’s parents, and destroying his cell phone won’t do much to protect him - there are all kinds of cell phone records that a determined investigation could turn up, if it comes to that. And if they’re in a state where both of them are unable to legally consent to sex, they might well both get charged.
If you’ll state the state that your nephew and his girlfriend have had sex in, it’s likely that one of the legal eagles here could assuage your worries. Or, at least, advise you to consult an attorney. Which you’ve done. What did your attorney say?
Oh, and ZPG? Answer Frank’s question, please.
What did your attorney say?
Nor can she.
Neither can the girl, which means that legally, your nephew is a rapist. Since they’re BOTH rapists, why not let them BOTH suffer?
Guess you should have taught him not to shake hands.
Don’t live in Illinois now, hon. And the district attorneys where I’m at like to look tough on crime and high in “good, Christian family values”.