119772075
It’s an order number. Had to paste on it on the rebate form.
The home address of a client. Best not to post it, I think.
Nice plan. Also, if you happen to have put one of your passwords into the Clipboard (by way of Copy or Cut) it may serve your long-term interests not to be sharing that.
textInfo.ToUpper(title)
Sarah Recital Dress Rehearsal
I was updating my calendar. There are many rehearsals.
Busy trying to write something to be read out at my uncle’s memorial service - this is what I posted on Facebook…
<>
Nothing is on my clipboard now as I just started this computer to fix the other computer. However, I use Yankee Clipper that can save multiple clips and has a boiler plate file for permanent save. A single clip is pretty useless to me. Yankee Clipper is like my second memory.
5052801347
Agent id for a large national department store location.
All manuscript pages must be numbered.
Work stuff - Trying to ascertain why correspondence sent to Nena was not being answered; apparently no one at the company had heard of a Nena, even though I had a letter from her written on the company’s letterhead.
Here is the schedule of times during which I will be unavailable:
Monday: 11:30 am to 4:30 pm
Tuesday: 11:30 am to 5:00 pm
Wednesday: 1:30 pm to 4:30 pm
Thursday: 11:30 am to 5:00 pm
Friday: 10:00 am to 5:00 pm
google.com doodle today
My clipboard contains the text of the post I just made in the Public Puking Stories thread, which I copied and pasted into a Word document to spell check.
A half finished equity assignment I’m doing on the sly at work:
There is a split of legal opinion on this issue because of the differences in wording between s23C(1)© and s23C(2) of the CA. Prima facie, a contract for valuable consideration to assign a subsisting equitable interest would require writing under s23C(1)©. However, a contract for valuable consideration creates a constructive trust between the seller and the buyer if the contract is specifically enforceable, as is the case here between Andrew and Michael. So it may be that the creation of the constructive trust negates the requirement of writing in s23C(1)© due to the wording of s23C(2).
This was examined in Oughtred v Inland Revenue Commissioner where Lord Radcliffe, in minority at 227-8, sad that an oral agreement in these circumstances gives rise to a constructive trust, which would invoke s23C(2) of the CA. The majority in this case did not speak to this issue; due to the facts of the case they decided based on an earlier transaction. In Neville v Wilson (FIND THE NAME) endorsed Lord Radcliffe’s view. This was approved in Baloglow v Knostanidis in New South Wales, and in the High Court of Australia in Halloran v Minister of Advertising National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 .
…and win, re-reading it HERE I found a typo that I have not seen before despite re-reading it a billion times in my word doc…
Let me see:
Let A_1 be the part of A^{\#\#} that i^{\#\#} maps into
B. Then in view of the above proposition, A is effectively dense in A_1 ,
so i^{\#\#} maps (A_1) into \ecl(A).\epf
Oh is that all. It was a quote from a draft written by a collaborator. I didn’t understand his argument and asked for elucidation. Got it later in the day. You probably don’t understand it either. But it turned out that the above proposition had been omitted from his draft. You will all be happy to know that I now understand it.
BTW, hitting ctl-V had no effect. I used shift-insert to insert it.
[National Microsoft Dynamics ISV Interactive MicroSession for Community Partners]
Copying stuff from a Microsoft invite to my calendar.
Today’s liturgical details which I just emailed to someone:
Thur 19 JAN
Feria
Green
4th Class
No Gloria, No Creed
Common Preface
Mass: Of 2nd Sunday after Epiphany
Commemoration of Saints Marius, Martha, Audifax and Abachum, MM at Low Mass and Lauds
Commemoration of Saint Canute, K, M at Low Mass and Lauds
Ferial Office