What's my obligation to art?

I’ve dreamt, at least 4 times of a particular painting.
At first I thought it was the Cover of Lennon’s Imagine album.
The second dream I realized it’s an angel. Clouds.

The clouds have thinned out in subsequent dreams to looking more like a stormy sky.

I could paint this. I haven’t painted in 2 or 3 years. Last painting was a mural in an elementary school of a cartoon-y Charlotte’s web scene. Just childs play. I finished is 3 visits.
Not my best work. But it was on a dare.

I’ve thought about it for a couple weeks. I even got in my art room and looked over what I have.

I haven’t sketched anything yet. But my fingers are itchy.

I just don’t know. This feels kinda final or something. I’ve made my peace I won’t do murals anymore.

Am I obligated to art to produce this image in a tangible way?

My importance to the art world is like absolutely zero. (Except in my self centered brain there’s this hope I may be remembered posthumously).

Oh, the conundrum of my worries!

Ehh, final? Maybe you won’t do any more murals right now. Maybe it’s your era of smaller pieces.

Are you obligated to make it into an actual work? Absolutely not. I get a bunch of visual and musical ideas in my head on any given day, and they usually disappear again into the electron cloud. Sometimes they return, sometimes I get the urge to make them tangible, and sometimes I follow through on the urge. On rare occasions, it’s a linear path from that to the finished product, often it just leads me to a bunch of other ideas. Sometimes those other ideas fade away, and sometimes they return to make me complete something. Sometimes the working out of an idea is a joy in itself, even if it never comes to a finished product.

The important question to ask is: would it be fulfilling to take another step towards making it realized? If the answer is yes, you should probably go ahead and at least make a sketch. If that makes you want to continue working to realize it, then I’d usually say you should continue.

If you feel the urge, you should probably try. But while neglecting that urge is unlikely to kill you, it’s usually more fun to indulge the urge at least a little bit.

Hey, for all fat lot of good it will do ya. ya never know - and hey, that could happen to any of us, and we’d never know. Do it to please yourself, first. If other people like it, that’s just gravy.

If your fingers are itching to do it, you may have an obligation to them!

I guess the answer is do it.
I probably will sketch it before the damn thing changes again.

It’s like saying there’s a novel in me, I should write it.
It just takes a little piece of your heart to do some of these things. Not that my art is all that important to any one but me.

But I feel an obligation since it’s presented itself so often in my dreams.

Either that or I am losing my marbles, for real.

Among other things, there is “Art.” With a deliberate capital A. Capital-A art tends to meet certain criteria, ranging from meeting universally agreed-to aesthetic standards, to wildly original, to having a social important message to … well, lots of stuff.

There is also a very valuable capital C: “C=creativity,”

All art is creative. Not all creativity is capital-A Art, but that doesn’t mean it lacks value. The distinction between creative and capital-A art does influence how museums and cultural institutions approach the particular art/creativity in question. It influences the crasser questions of, “what is the value of this piece? Should I buy it as an investment: Will its value increase?” As well as the more thoughtful questions of, “Does this work illuminate the human condition in a way that hasn’t been done before? Am I stirred by what I feel when I experience this artwork, in a way I could not have otherwise felt?”

All of these questions go into the determination of what qualifies as Art, but that does not mean everyone who desires to express themselves creatively needs to care.

Being creative/artistic is a fine way to be human.

I was gonna post what I’ve been commissioned to do. But I decided that was bragging.

I’ve come to believe that’s not as creative as I would have liked to have used my abilities, in this life. It is what it is.

My more creative pursuits have been for my own benefit. I’ve never shown but one time. I sold some things. But it was less than fulfilling. It was kinda depressing actually.

I like to think I’m creative. This dream may be the most unique way an art process has ever came to me.
It worries me.

I have a fine arts degree. I have a shelf full of books on painting, sculpture, textile arts, etc., both historical and modern. I’ve been to art museums all over the world. If I were in Paris for three days by myself with no obligations, I would spend all three of them at the Louvre, from opening to closing every day, seeing everything I can. My wife gets tired after four or five hours in a museum; I am energized.

When we went to Florence a few months ago, I took my family to the Uffizi. My wife went off by herself so she could see the highlights she wanted to see and take guilt-free breaks from time to time, and the kids attached themselves to my arms and said “show us the art.” After many museum tours, they know I am good at explaining this stuff, finding the simple, basic entry points that engage them and make them feel like they’re mastering knowledge. For example, at the Uffizi, knowing the emphasis on sculpture, I pointed out that artists carving a standing figure in marble needed to consider structural stability, so notice how the statue always has a tree stump or rock formation behind one leg; now start looking for examples of the sculptor coming up with clever new approaches, like a drape of clothing reaching the ground instead of a natural object. They spent the next couple of hours going from statue to statue, pointing out the sculptor’s solution on each, and thinking about how the heavy material is being held up.

So, yeah, I take this seriously.

And I say, you have no “obligation to Art.”

Art is not a thing in and of itself. It’s not even that Art is an intangibility or an abstraction, because Art is not separate from you. Art happens inside you. When you look at a piece of Art, you take it into yourself and you see what happens. You may consider the piece entirely on its own merits, or you can consider the historical or thematic context, or you can attempt to speculate about the artist’s mindset and intentions while and for creating it. However you approach it, whatever your reaction is, it happens inside you. When you’re creating art, you similarly take an idea or an inspiration into yourself, and then something happens, and a piece of work comes out.

Your obligation, therefore, is not to Art. Your obligation is to yourself.

Be open. Be free. Be honest. Be self-critical — not in the sense of whether the Art is “good enough,” but in the sense of whether you are genuinely listening to your own creative voice and not getting in your own way with irrelevant considerations. This is equally true whether you are simply consuming Art — opening your eyes and mind to allow the work an opportunity to do something to you (and it may not) — or creating it.

The act is both selfish and generous. It is a paradox. It’s a simple thing, but it’s difficult in its simplicity. It’s very Zen in that way.

And when it’s really working, the feeling is transcendent.

See? This is why I’m in a quandary.

I have no, not even the tiniest belief it will transcend anything. But me.

So the obligation is to my self.

I know I can produce this painting pretty much how I’m dreaming it.
I think I will.

Sounds like the beginning of a Stephen King novel.

Reminds me that scene with Clark Griswold going to the Eiffel Tower.

That’s my life a comedic/horror.

Your only obligation to art is to be genuine. That’s it.

Well, that, and post it on the SMDB in Café Society so we can all judge it. That’s all.

In all honesty, my feeling is that the term “obligation” is totally curved, and I absolutely don’t like it. Unless they are hurting others or threatening society, people have a right to live the one life given to them in the way that they choose. Just because you have a special talent/gift, that doesn’t enslave you to that life choice.

This reminds me of Professor Lambeau’s fanatical desire to get Will Hunting to live the life that he envisioned that he should live in the movie, “Good Will Hunting”. That creeped me out as well. Here is a related movie quote:

“Most days I wish I’d never met you, ’cause then I could sleep at night. I didn’t have to walk around with the knowledge that there was someone like you out there. I didn’t have to watch you throw it all away.”

— Professor Lambeau

You still owe Art thirty bucks from the poker game. He’s too nice to bring it up, but you really should pay him.

Actually, Mr Linkletter passed away 14 years ago. The debt is forgiven.

Garfunkel cheats. Let me just say that.

You say the darndest things.

zing!

Kids, kids!