What's the difference between Admins and Mods?

I know that certain people on this board (TubaDiva, CKDextHavn, Lynn Bodoni, Ed Zotti, etc.) are administrators, while others (David B, manhattan, slythe, UncleBeer, etc.) are moderators. Obviously, one diffence would be that the admins are responsible for the day-to-day running of the boards (while the mods are only content-responsible).

My question, however, is this: What “powers” do the admins have on this board, that the moderators do not?

Zev Steinhardt

Oddly enough, I think Mods are volunteers, and can do everything on this list at the bottom of the page.

Admin (sic) Options:
Open / Close Thread
Move Thread
Delete Thread
Edit Thread

The actual Admins are employees of the Chicago Reader and can do those things plus the unnamed ones which require access to the machine directories, rather than just the vB software. This would include:

  • Making a thread into an Announcement thread
  • Changing a user’s name
  • Changing status - no posting, banning, and the undoing of those.
  • Fixing bugs like not getting emails when your thread is answered.
  • And ultimately, getting a vote on which changes get made, like new forums or disabling the Membership feature.

You’re right, except that administrators are also volunteers.

And so are members of the Straight Dope Science and Advisory Board (SDSAB).

Ed (and of course, Cecil) are Reader staff. None of the rest of us, though.

It’s not all awful, volunteers do get a nice coffee mug.

your humble TubaDiva
Administrator
[Edited by TubaDiva on 10-31-2000 at 04:03 PM]

Thank you TubaDiva.

Zev Steinhardt

Well, they’re not being entirely accurate.

The “Moderator” was the first moderation program, but it quickly proved to have many bugs in the operation. They were replaced by the “Moderator Mark II”, also known as “Administrator”, which took over the major functions of the board. The Mark I’s were demoted to the more grueling tasks of the SDMB.

Pretty soon (estimated sometime in the first quarter of 2001), the “Moderator Mark III” will be released, and the Administrators will be demoted, while the Moderators will be scrapped entirely. The Mark III will eliminate such flaws as the need for sleep, food, or drink, plus it’ll fix program glitches like “having a life”, “emotion”, and the desire for chocolate.

And this entire post is pure fiction, too :smiley: (Tuba’s gonna kill me one of these days).

Just to amplify on SPOOFE’s elegant summary of the situation, the beta version of Moderator Mark III has been released and is currently operating in the Pit under the name “John Corrado.” It’s been a good field test so far, and ModIII seems to be doing a good job of integrating the previous version’s “Bloomberg” and “Beer” subroutines. Whether it will be able to fully integrate the “Tuba v6.0” and “Cecil” addons remains to be seen, but the prognosis is positive.

They still have to work out the “crawling in bed with Satan” bug, though.

Actually, that’s the bug that’s been screwing up the whole program this whole time. The ModIII would have been out by now if not for the CIBWS glitch.

Well, we’re never be phased out completely… We’re freeware, and NO free program ever dissapears. We’ll just end up running on ten-year old machines with a fraction of the power and double-digit baud modems :slight_smile:

I don’t understand why we have to be replaced at all. I, for one, am in perfectly good condition bzzzzt condition *bzzzzt *condition bzzzzt condition bzzzzt

The Mods were the guys who rode the scooters in Quadrophenia, and the Admins were the guys who rode the motorcycles.

That’s not a bug.

That’s a feature.