[QUOTE=kunilou]
Even if I grant that historically that may have been the case, let me share the white male perspective.
Line up 100 qualified applicants for a job, a loan or anything else. Let’s say the 100 applicants represent the racial and sexual makeup of the country.
Each has a theoretical 1% chance of getting the job.
Eliminate the 50 women from the applicant pool…
Now, eliminate all black, Hispanic and Asian men from the pool. That takes another 15%, leaving 35 people.
If you’re on the outside, with a 0% chance of getting the job, white guys get all the breaks.
If you’re on the inside, your chance is still less than 3%.
So the “advantage” the white guy sees is 34 other people going after the same job.
I’m not going to insult anyone on the board and claim that being a white guy is tougher than being anything else. But 3% in an all-white-guy world doesn’t feel a lot better than 1% in a perfectly race/sex-neutral world.
[/QUOTE]
What kind of bullshit analysis is that? In an “all-white guy world” all the applicants would be white guys, the world WOULD be race and gender neutral, and the chance of getting the job would be 1%.
And even in YOUR world, with it’s unusual mathematics, 3% is THREE TIMES 1%, unless the multiplication rules are changed too. That is a BIG advantage.
By my math, with your scenario, a white guy would have a 3% chance against 0% for a woman or minority. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe that’s an even BIGGER advantage.
I am also a white male. And I know for a FACT that I was not hired for one job because a black manager decided to hire a black, less qualified candidate.
It doesn’t really matter if you can come up with some particulars where being white is not an advantage. So can I. For instance, it would not have been to your advantage to be white at at the corner of Florence and Normandy during the Rodney King riots. So what? Being white will play out to your advantage far more often in your life than it will to your detriment.