My company sells 3D printers and performs 3D printing and rapid prototyping (RP) services, so I have some familiarity with this, though I work in a different group than RP. My knowledge of typical service costs is lacking, unfortunately, though I do know some machine costs.
One thing to note about 3D printing and other RP technologies is that they all work by building up a part layer by layer, typically out of some sort of polymer, so the idea of 3D printing for wood wouldn’t work here (that I can imagine, anyway). You’d be looking at some sort of CNC machine for that.
I’ll give you a lowdown on the three main RP technologies here, going from cheapest to most expensive. I’ve only ever heard 3D printing to refer to the first item I’m listing. Stereolithography and Selected Laser Sintering are the other two technologies.
3D Printing
In 3D printing, ABS plastic is fed through an injection nozzle where it’s heated up and deposited on a platform, kind of like a spider spinning a 3D web. It performs this a later at a time with the platform dropping for each subsequent layer until the part is complete. Stratasys’ method is called Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Wikipedia has a pretty good article on the process.
The nice thing about 3D printing is that resolution (of the layers) and part strength has improved immensely over the years (take it from someone who knows) and costs have dropped considerably. Resolution is about 0.007"=0.013" depending on how much you want to pay for a machine.
The only machine I’ve found that’s really targeted to individual purchase and use is the Desktop Factory 3D Printer, which goes for about US$5000. The max build size is only about 5"x5"x5" though. My company sells Dimension printers, which are generally intended for industrial use. Prices range from US$19,000-US$33,000, but the prices are constantly dropping (I remember how excited I was just a few years ago when the cheapest model dropped to US$30,000).
Stereolithography (SLA)
Again, parts are built layer by layer with this process. In this case, UV rays are projected into a resin, curing the resin wherever it hits. A porous platform supports the build. Once a layer is complete, the platform drops slightly, the resin is spread evenly across the platform, and another layer is built. Again, pretty good article in Wikipedia on this.
The resolution for SLA is the best of the various RP technologies: about 0.002"-0.006". We use RP parts to create molds for injection molding, among other things. It’s significantly more expensive than 3D printing.
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
This is the process most likely used in the links you provided in your second post. It’s also the most expensive, in terms of the machine itself as well as the product.
SLS is similar to SLA, except with a powder instead of a liquid. The way it works is that a polymer powder (e.g. Duraform) is heated to just under the melting point of the powder. A laser strikes the powder where the layer is to be built, fusing the powder grains together. Once a layer is complete, the platform supporting the layer drops slightly and another layer of powder, provided by a couple of feed bins, is spread across the top. This continues until the part is built after which the build bin is removed and the part(s) retrieved from the powder, which is kind of messy.
SLS parts are a bit more grainy than SLA or even 3D printing parts. However they are very durable (we use SLS parts in lab testing at work). Also, since the part is built in a solid powder instead of a liquid resin, the part is self-supporting, meaning you can build actual assemblies with this process without any additional supporting structure that would have to be broken out later. (Our samples included a number of linking gear assemblies, which are pretty nifty).
How metal parts are made with SLS: The metal powder used for SLS actually consists of metal grains, each surrounded by a layer of nylon. When the metal part is built in the SLS machine, it’s actually the nylon layers of the grains being fused together. An additional step is required in which the part is place in an oven which evaporates the nylon and heats the metal up to the point where the metal grains fuse together. There are two main problems we’ve encountered with this: If it’s an assembly being built, contact parts of the assembly frequently get fused together. Also, the material used for this process is toxic and requires quite a bit of cleanup. Things may have improved since I last investigated this though. Regardless, don’t be surprised if any metal parts you want to building end up being prohibitively expensive.
I’m not sure if I’ve addressed everything you’re looking for, but I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, I have people working around me who can probably give some pretty good answers.