What's Wrong With Black Lives Matter

Why can’t he be both, like the late Earl Warren?

“Exactly where we are” appears to be some mythical world in which every black neighborhood has continuous crime and no black people are ever imprisoned for first drug offenses.

How is it that you’ve managed this far on the Dope by manufacturing your own little fictional world?

That’s enough, levdrakon. Keep it civil.

nm

Ignorance fought!

You’re pretty wrong.

Oh, wait, is the “committed a crime” how you’re going to weasel out of this? “I said never committed a crime, not never arrested”, is that going to be the tack?

When did I say “every” black neighborhood is anything? I can’t answer to things that “appear to be” and are “mythical.”

If you don’t understand something, by all means ask. I try not to delve in “mythical” outside of Cafe Society.

In your opinion, is what you’re advocating for different from straightforward racism?

Post 155. You said you can’t live near a black neighborhood without being a constant victim of crime. Did you not mean that literally?

Fundamentally, people are all the same. The labels we ascribe to ourselves, to identify one person against another, are illusions: products of our imagination. Which is not to say they’re unimportant. How many people have died for one country, when they would have died for the other side, but for an accident of birth?

BLM didn’t mourn Tyshawn, because he wasn’t killed by the right type of person. Similarly, they didn’t protest David Kassick’s death, because although he was shot by the right type of person, he wasn’t the right type of person himself.

Maybe it’s human nature: maybe there must be a “them,” in order for there to be an “us”. And we all know how important it is to be included.

Edited to add: I see you’ve been banned. I’m surprised it hasn’t happened to me yet. I expect it will happen soon.

BLM as a movement exists to highlight and oppose law enforcement mistreatment of minorities. Why is that objectionable to anyone?

Is it your opinion that if you care about innocent black people getting killed by police, then you must therefore not care about innocent (I assume) white people being killed by police? Because if so, that’s a pretty stupid opinion.

OK. A report assessing the overall harm caused by the drugs, (with alcohol far ahead of each), that includes in its assessment the harm from imprisonment and other related issues. Contrast that the to the actual medical assessments of the drugs themselves that make no such claim. Then a government report explaining why it considers the need to more harshly criminalize one drug over the other, thus perpetuating the funding to support existing programs. Again, contrasted against the actual medical examinations provided by subsequent posters.

The laws were not initially passed for racist reasons. However, once the hysteria of the first couple of years passed and more sober assessments showed that crack was not instantly addicting, the laws were left in place for nearly twenty years while evidence mounted that they were unfair. That is institutional racism.

And even if some discrepancies in harm can be demonstrated, that would not justify the fact that law enforcement more heavily targets black communities when white use of powder is actually higher than black use of crack.

Did you see what he was banned for? Unless you plan to say “fuck off” in GD, I’m afraid that your martyrdom will have to wait.

Cite that I said that.

:confused:

Selective quoting disregarding the meaning of the paragraph it belongs to.

So make that case; don’t deny that you said what you said.

How does the rest of the paragraph change the meaning of that sentence? Are you saying that you did not mean the words that you used?