What conditions would have to exist before you could support U.S. action against Iraq?
This should be in IMHO but,
- If Iraq instigated an attack on another nation
- If UN inspectors conclusively declared Iraq unwilling to fully disarm
- If the Security Council agreed military action was absolutely required to disarm Iraq
Personally, I think Saddam is a convenient tail for Bush to wag, and bin Laden and N. Korea are for more pressing concerns. So is mediating peace in Israel.
oops… tail should be dog
This isn’t a factual question, so it doesn’t really belong in GQ. I’m not sure whether you intended this to be a poll or a debate, so I’ll close this thread and let you open another in GD or IMHO, whichever suits your purposes better.