Hate is an emotion. There’s nothing wrong with acknowledging and feeling any emotions. However, allowing emotions to develop into actions that infringe upon the rights of others, now that’s where people will say “You can” or “You can’t” with regards to HATE.
Many people will say that Hating anything isn’t healthy for you. But I say (for the hill of beans it’s worth) : Just don’t let it dominate your thoughts and you won’t end up being somebody nasty like Darth Vader or Hitler.
Onward with the battle of moral opinions! Let the odiferous bung-holes emanate their foul stench! (opinions are like assholes, note the smell around this post)
The trouble is that the definition of ‘evil’ is pretty subjective. ‘Evil’ people don’t THINK they are evil, after all.
Personally, I don’t think it’s ever a good idea to hate large groups of people (just like I don’t think it’s a good idea to automatically love large groups of people). I take people individually, and while I might despise, dislike or have some other strong negative reaction to people individually, I generally reserve ‘hate’ for those who truly deserve it. So, I probably wouldn’t ‘hate’ ‘Nazi’ as a whole, or The Klan, I would reserve ‘hate’ for those leaders and more egregious members of said groups. This isn’t to say I like either group…I despise both. But they are pretty large groups, and individually it would be too much effort to ‘hate’ every one of them.
The question to ask is, is this a wise use of your limited time on this earth? There are 6 billion humans on this planet, many of them who do very disagreeable things. There’s always somebody you could be pissed off at. Even if they deserve your hatred, do you deserve to have your own peace of mind disturbed by holding on to hatred?
Yes. Of course, most poeple don’t seem to have any diea what hating someone means. Much like saying they “love” something, they use it as a cheap word for everyday anger.
For a theological viewpoint - if such interests you - see Perelandra by C.S. Lewis, one of his sci-fi allegory books. This one is an allegory about the initial Fall - a saintly man from Earth is carried to Venus by heavenly forces to prevent another Fall from happening there. (Er, no, the climate reported for Venus is not, er, accurate.)
While there, our saint finds a demon that needs destroyin’ - and is amazed to have finally found a proper place and use for hate. He’s found a source of pure evil, and he finds that he hates it, truly hates it - and he’s for once found something he can hate without accidentally hating the person instead of the evil. He’s found that the hatred gives him a temporary surge of energy that he can use to great benefit - if he uses it well.
No thanks. I am not superstitious and don’t believe in God. I don’t care what the invisible unicorn thinks.
And I don’t buy the line about “don’t hate groups.” The vast majority of evil done in the world is institutional evil, people acting in groups. If you advance the groups’ agenda, you are part of that group and responsible. I do not accept the idea that “oh he has a good heart, even though he’s KKK/NAMBLA/GOP”
There are no evil people, merely people who do evil things. Hate the evil that men do but not the men themselves; we are all capable of good and evil, and even those who commit great evils may do good sometimes. If you try to divide the world into “good people” and “evil people” things will get very muddy very quickly. Even the Kray twins were good to their mother, after all.
I’m not saying you must love the sinner (although good for you if you manage it), but it’s better to focus your hate on the sin itself.
I’m not sure I agree that there are no evil people. There may very well be individuals out there who, if I truly knew them, I would not hesitate to call them evil.
However, that’s a big “if.” I am not qualified to judge whether a particular person is “evil.” And I certainly am not qualified to call someone evil based on their membership in some group, nor based on one or more individual acts they may have committed.
If a person who has done evil is capable of redemption—which would involve seeing that evil for what it is and truly repenting of it—I would prefer such redemption to their destruction.
I suppose the important distinction I’m making is this: many people, and certainly many Hollywood films, act as if people do evil things because they are evil people. I’m saying that they are evil people (sic) because they do evil things.
The Nazis were not evil because God put a black hat on them at birth; they were evil for killing lots of people and starting a rather large war. The US is likewise not intrinsically good; its goodness (as is) is dependent on the extent to which it lives up to its higher ideals (liberty, justice, apple pie, blah blah blah). Where it (or its representatives) do bad things (waterboarding, extraordinary rendition, Baconnaise), it’s not so good.