This guy’s schtick is paper thin. Clearly, it’s about getting his jollies simply by abusing and insulting people and causing them psychological distress (or attempting, anyway, using the .22 caliber wit he clearly believes is a weapon of mass destruction) in an effort to feel better about whatever it is he believes is wrong with him. Last time I checked, this wasn’t that type of message board. His hopelessly ineffective “attacks” were amusing for a while, but, in my opinion at least, it got really old some time ago, and now he’s just taking up bandwidth.
Have not enough people complained via email, or what?
I don’t mind the abuse you’ve all laid out on me, I can take it. But damn, what you guys have done to Muffin is beyond reproach. Making an obscure poster think the only way he can “belong” to the hip inner circle is by shoveling abuse on others while the gallery alternately flirts with and cheers him on? Jesus, did you promise him 40 virgins, too? It just seems a little sleazy. I mean, look at this thread. He wasted his entire Sunday on me. You owe him an apology. I’m sure his cat feels very neglected today, too. Did you ever think of that?
And you forgot to go fuck yourself with the buisness end of a rake, asshole.
Did you take my advice and read a book yet, idiot? I mean besides “Heelarious Combacks for Circus Geeks and Trolls”
That can’t be true, it fails to explain why are there soooo many more ugly people? like me? (Ugly on the outside, not the inside, thank you very much!)
And you know where you can stick your assumptions about MY sister.
According to her. She’s made that clear.
Well, why don’t you ASK her? Oh wait! YOU don’t know her! But I do! She’s MY sister! Ya think maybe I know just a teensy bit more about her than you do? Ya think?
EVERY one? So you know what kind of romances SHE reads, and you know WHY she reads them, and you know WHAT content is in each romance she reads? Is this it? So you’ve read EVERY pulp romance novel that ever was written? So you know this for sure? Boy, that sure says something about you. :rolleyes:
Sure, they say “something”, but what? What exactly do it “say”? What does it say when a person reads a lot of, for instance, westerns? Please, oh wise one, enlighten us. WHAT does it say? You’ve got it all figured out, after all.
Of course you don’t mind. That’s what this thread was started for, wasn’t it?
Ah, good, the old ‘secret clique/inner circle’ argument. Haven’t seen this nearly enough. :rolleyes: Hey Bossk, if you don’t feel accepted here and out of the ‘inner circle’ maybe you could quit insulting the board at large, huh? You’ve done nothing but take pot shots at people here since you started the OP.
But what am I saying - you couldn’t quit if you wanted to could you? It’s your way of feeling superior: lumping people into groups and demeaning those groups. By doing so you feeling better than said groups of people. You did it in the OP and now you’re doing it with the people in this thread - we don’t agree with you threrefore we must belong to a ‘group’ which you make up in your own mind. You don’t belong to that ‘group’ so you mock it.
So who’s in this clique? Most of the names I’ve seen here are only vaguely familiar with. I don’t interact with them on a regular basis on the boards, we don’t chat or email off the boards. So if they’re in the clique, that must mean I’m not right? I mean how can I be a clique if I barely know these people? But I still don’t agree with you and think you’re acting like a fucknugget who needs to be bitch-slapped with a crowbar.
Consider just for a minute that it’s not a conspiratorial clique and maybe - just maybe - the problem is your immature fucking attitude that’s pissing people off.
You know, this is the first time I’ve ever been included in “The Clique” and to be the clique miester, well that puts me in the mood for a song. . . . The Dick called me cliquemiester
I’m an ugly fuck
with superpowers and such
I’m too much
O.K., I’m no Fenris, but go ahead and try to get that damned song out of your head now.
I’ve come to the conclusion that there is a SDMB clique. It is a clique that includes the admins, the moderators and all the important posters.
Oh, wait. It includes all the unimportant posters too, and the newbies. Silly me, I forgot to mention that the only people it excludes are stupid fucks.
{And Bus Boy teeters on the street corner, holding out his hat for coins, somehow mistaking his invective for humour while he makes fun of a person’s dearly loved and recently departed pet . . . but he laughs so hard he falls back into the gutter . . . and the passersby take pity on him mewling and puking in his bile . . . }
{And a strong young mother happens along with her sweet child in hand . . . she hides her child’s eyes, and places herself between her care and the Pus Boy’s watery stage . . . shielding her child as they hurry past, away from the stench of the Pus Boy in the gutter . . .}
{And such is the final stage of the Pus Boy . . . sadly empty.}
Please show me where I assumed any of the above. Where did I say romance novels are replacing sex? Maybe they’re being used as a poor substitute, but “replacing” it? Nah. You misunderstood me. And as for your alleged assumptions #2 & #3:
**
In my very first post I clearly said I believed the exact opposite of the things you are accusing me of assuming.
NOW, as for yosemitebabe…
Boy, you really have it in for me, don’t you? I make one post expressing my opinion, and you jump all over my ass from the get-go. Does this go back to the thread about dating? Or is the smell of your own under-used twat addling your brains? Please don’t labor under the mistaken impression that your pathetic attempts at “sarcasm” actually bother me. I don’t give a rat’s ass about your sister’s sex life, or how well you two know each other. And just what big “assumptions” did I make, other than guessing that if she likes romance novels, then she probably likes real romance or sex? (Since when is that such a huge leap?) I really doubt even you know every … single … teensy … tiny … little … thing about her. That was my point, and your own statements proved this. You claimed to “know more” about her then me. Well, then were’s the explanation she gave you for reading these books? Hmmm?
Don’t bother anwering that, cause I really don’t give a damn. If you have nothing better to do than deliberately go out of your way to annoy me, then you’re even more pathetic than I think you are.
Then again, I’m sure I couldn’t underestimate you in that regard. I’ll be expecting more hostile, look-at-me-I’m-desperate-for-attention posts shortly. But whether your existence is even worth acknowledging anymore is anyone’s guess.
So then why are you acknowledging it with your post? If she isn’t worth acknowledging, as you seem to be suggesting in this sentence, then don’t acknowledge her. Saying “I don’t know if you’re important enough to respond to” is, much like bossk’s “Ummmmmmmmmmmmm…”, a childish response, and one that most people in this thread probably saw right through.
This is too funny. Where did all this hostility come from? What was it that pushed you over the edge here? How is it that my somewhat sarcastic post prompted such an explosive response? Was I even a fraction as “hostile” as you have been here? (Like, God Forbid I disagree with you, and challenge your assumptions? That makes me “out to get you”?) How paranoid can you get?
And you sure do have a long memory, m’dear. The dating thread was a LOOOONG time ago, and I’d pretty much forgotten it, until you brought it up. And pray tell, how many times have I “been out to get you” since? I mean, I’d like for you to establish a pattern of behavior here. And I think you’ll need to do better than bringing up ONE old moldy thread, where we locked horns. So cites, please? Anyone else notice that “have it in” for Lizard? Because this is all news to me.