Okay, so I was talking to my sister tonight, and she just this week finished reading The Women’s Room. One thing she wanted to discuss was a disturbing sequence late in the story, when a college student is raped by a stranger. Not just the assault, but the secondary assault, when she was in court, being interrogated as if she was the one who did a crime. And of course, the rapist’s public defender claimed that his client said it was consensual. (Not in the street, said the victim’s mother.) “Yeah, I’ve read other books where that happens,” said I.
Two other teenage female characters in the 1970s had to deal with that nonsense: Gail, in Are You In the House Alone? by Richard Peck, and Jaret, in Happy Endings Are All Alike by Sandra Scoppettone. Both of them are stalked by their rapists, although Jaret doesn’t know it until too late. Gail’s stalker keeps her on edge with hang-up calls and threatening notes. Both sustain injuries. Gail is knocked out by a fireplace poker before the act; Jaret gets a broken nose and split lip, plus cracked ribs, and a knockout punch at the end. Both of them are in a hospital room when a police officer comes in, supposedly to get a statement, but really to interrogate and intimidate her.
And both officers try to reframe the incident as something else. Gail says “I’d been getting phone calls, notes…I was scared because someone was trying to scare me.” This is translated by Officer Sleazebag as “You and him talk on the phone – keep in touch.” He then paints a story of consensual makeout session that gets out of hand, and ends with “[L]et’s be honest…what you both want to do, but you’re a nice girl, and you don’t give in that easy. So maybe there’s some rough stuff…now you got this nasty bump on the head [uh, a concussion!]…so you kind of build up a story around it.” Jaret’s interrogator creates the same kind of fantasy, and when her parents object, he threatens to have them removed, and adds, “If she’s innocent, there’s nothing to worry about.” And in both cases, the story they made up was still rape. But date rape didn’t exist as a concept back then.
So after I got done telling Sis all this, and after she got done ugh-ing and argh-ing, she had an anecdote to share. When her son was 21 or so, he was mugged. Someone demanded his wallet; they had no visible weapon, but announced their willingness to beat the crap out of him. Well, he didn’t want to take a chance on fighting the guy (hospital bills, maybe hurt too bad to work), but he was afraid that meekly handing over the wallet would lead to “Gimme your car keys too.” So he said, “Can you just take the cash?” And the guy agreed, maybe because that was easier. So my nephew lost about fifty bucks but kept his teeth and his car.
Sis: “And nobody said ‘Why did you cooperate with him?’ They all said ‘That was smart!’…What’s my point? Well, how do you think those cops would have reacted if it had been a boy with those injuries? If it wasn’t rape, just a beating and robbery, but he was still hurt that bad, would they think he’d brought it on himself?”
Me: “I think I get it. Once those guys heard ‘rape’, they shut down. Blinded themselves to any evidence, because they just didn’t want to believe it.”
Sis: “Maybe because they’d have to look at themselves, when they were that age. Anyway, thank Christ it’s not like that today. I hope, anyway…”
Also, not to make this post longer, but now I’m thinking of a couple of advice-to-teenagers books, also from the turn of the 1970s, that warned girls about “giving up a lot of sex” and finding their reputations in tatters. “Don’t say there’s nothing you can do to stop him,” says one, suggesting a “firm no…a slap across the face as a last resort.” Another has a quote from some random teen guy, who stated, “The automatic pass is a test. If a girl…flunks on the second date, there’s no way I’m bringing her home to meet my mother.” Makes me wonder how many rapes went unreported back then.
So, I guess my point is, I’m glad things have changed – No Means No, rape shield laws, and of course, MeToo. But I still wonder about that old mindset, especially since there are bound to be some (I hope not many) people who still think that way. I’m just trying to figure out their logic, if only so I’ll know how faulty it is.