My wife got a Victorias Secret catalog this month and I looked through it and noticed that all the nipples (and various other body parts) have apparently been censored digitally.
If you have the catalog, look on page 9. The woman is whering this little thing that only covers half of her breasts. Her nipples should be completely exposed but instead, they are just big blank Marilyn Manson boobs–its freaky.
What is the point?
dammit i hate when i have stupid typos like “whering”—duh… and the title should be “where did the nipples go?” Geez im a moron.
And the reason i posted it in this board is because censorship is vaugely related to art and society.
The ladies don’t like having to pry the pages apart after their boyfriend has “borrowed” the catalog?
You don’t want to know the various things that flashed through my mind reading “where did the nipples go IN” 
They’re probably airbrushed out for the usual (unnecessary, IMHO) reasons. Nipples are on BOOBS and BOOBS are related to sexual whatnots, so therefore, the sight of nipples is BAD and WRONG and SINFUL.
Heck, I’ve known people who think it’s immoral to look at lingerie catalogues because “they’re pretty much pornographic”. So there ya go.
Yes but for all practical purposes, the woman I am looking at right now in this thing is bare-breasted except for a little support-bra cup thing toward the bottom.
How did the nipple become such a taboo item compared to the rest of the breast? I mean, god… a full page bare breasted woman with no nipples. That’s freekn bizzare.
Q: How do you make three pounds of fat look attactive?
A: Put a nipple on it.
As for the nipples… I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the models actually were wearing pasties.
I just received a copy of Frederick’s of Hollywood, and couldn’t for the life of me figure out what was wrong with the model on the cover. As I perused the pages it finally clicked, not a one of those poor girls had nipples. I can understand the cover model having her chi-chis airbrushed, since they don’t ship in a plain brown wrapper and you can never underestimate the damage viewing a nipple might do to a child’s psyche. But why the rest of ‘em? They looked sort of pathetic, as though they’d been infantalized, their woman-hood denied. I’m not a fan of ol’ Frederick’s wares to begin with and the implication that a part of me is too wicked to be seen in a catalog full of sex clothes did not inspire a change of mind.
Of course, thanks to the thread’s title, that song, Where Did All the Flowers Go? keeps playing in my mind.
( . )( . )
There, are ya happy now?
Nobody else finds it funny that Crazy Boob started a topic about nipples (or the lack thereof)?
No, I suppose not… sigh
ROTFLMAO*
IDBB
I would assume the the Victoria’s Secret folks are prudently concerned that nipples could push their catalogue into the realm of pornography by violating obscenity statutes in some localities, so they are playing it safe by excising the nipples. I noticed a similar phenomenon in February’s Maxim.
Actually, yes, I was finding it quite amusing, and also wondering if perhaps his username had anything to do with him being interested enough to notice such things.
I was thinking that if someone else didn’t mention it, I would.
At first I misread that as prudishly.
LOL:D
Boobies…proceeds to laugh in a vaguel Beavis and Butthead fashionHeh heh heh heh…boobies…heh heh heh heh…
IDBB
Heh – we got a Playboy clothing catalog in the mail today, and none of those girls have nips either. I immediately thought of this thread.
Scarlett, amazed to find that she has something that Playmates apparently don’t
That’d be the irony, Bob. I know plenty of people who read them for exactly that reason.
Actually, I read them for the articles.
There are pictures? Of girls?
That’s just freaking hysterical! Ohmy… Thanks for the laugh!
Can you see any of the models from the waist down? Maybe they’re really lady centaurs.
I first read the thread title as “Where do the nipples go in?” and thought that there was an entire aspect of sex that I was previously unaware of.