As to Beowulf’s comments about virtual hobbies being “sad”, I think I see his point. Maybe it’s an age-thing. To me, age 52, a “hobby” is defined by something “solid”. Woodworking, model cars, model trains, model airplanes, archery, etc. There are tangible (literally, not metaphorically: touchable) results.
Despite the amount of work involved, doing a hobby on computers seems…lazy? Like the stereotype of the kids in front of the TV all day - get up and go DO something! I admit, it’s a perception thing. It’s like some parody science fiction of the ‘brave new world’ - everyone does traditional hobbies on computers. Everyone shows off their virtual trains, their virtual quilts, their virtual model rockets, and only the readers (or the time-transplanted reader analog) see how “odd” it really is.
I’m not condemning virtual railroading. I like model trains, but the cost and room required keeps me from having a layout. I have experimented with virtual trains, but I don’t want to spend the money on THAT either (and the time-it would eat into my model car time:)). Also, virtual trains is to me a different hobby. Running virtual trains is one thing (it’s like virtual airplane flying; each involves skill), but having a virtual train collection seems like looking at pictures.
I can see how I could be coming across as condescending, but I am not meaning to. I am just giving my perspective. Like, I also collect vintage arcade games (Star Wars, Battle Zone, etc). Now, they can be emulated to run on a desktop, but playing the games that way doesn’t (in the words of Scotty) feel right. I think you need the “feel”, the heft, of the original cabinet and controls.
It’s obviously nostalgia-I’m trying to recreate my lost youth!
[pout] I’m going to go play with my (Duncan Butterfly) yo-yo now!