Bonds had 762 career home runs. Rodriguez currently has 583, a difference of 179 home runs. Rodrigues will start the 2010 season at age 34 (he’ll turn 35 half-way through).
He doesn’t have to hit 40 home runs. He doesn’t even have to come close. I’ll forget about Bonds, Sosa, and McGwire (who had his best season when he was older than A-Rod is now); their numbers are outliers for a lot of reasons. But here are some hitters, and their average home runs for ages 34-38:
Edgar Martinez: 28
Gary Sheffield: 28
Jim Thome: 28
Ken Griffey, Jr: 26
Jason Giambi: 26
Frank Thomas: 28
Fred McGriff: 28
Chipper Jones: 24 (only 4 seasons; age 38 season pending)
Jim Edmonds: 24
Manny Ramirez: 28 (only 4 seasons; age 38 season pending)
Here I’ve listed only fairly modern players, to provide an adequate comparison. Note that every single one of these players is/was not just an inferior hitter compared to Alex Rodriguez, but a markedly inferior hitter. Most of these guys are not first-ballot Hall-of-Famers; many of them are not Hall-of-Famers at all. And yet only the two with the least career power (Jones and Edmonds) averaged less than 24 home runs during the 5-year period we’re discussing, and Griffey and Giambi both had injury issues way out of proportion to what we’d expect from Rodriguez. Given this, I don’t think it’s at all unreasonable to expect that A-Rod can average 28 home runs a year for the next five years.
And again, that’s assuming that his production only matches Sheffield’s over the same period in their respective careers, which is a bad assumption since Rodriguez has outperformed Sheffield over every other period in their careers (from age 25-30, for example, Sheffield hit 128 home runs; Rodriguez hit 240). So there’s really an excellent chance that Rodriguez will actually average more like 30 a year for the next five, but let’s be conservative and say that he only matches Sheffield - not a guarantee, of course, but not a terribly dangerous bet, either.
That’ll give him 723 home runs going into his age 38 season (Bonds had 613).
He’ll be 40 short of owning the record. As he begins his age 38 season.
Let’s look at that list again - here are the total home runs each player had beginning with his age 38 season and continuing through the end of his career (asterisks indicate currently active players who will or may play in 2010):
Martinez: 74
Sheffield: 54*
Thome: 23*
Griffey, Jr: 37*
Giambi: 13*
Thomas: 73
McGriff: 45
Jones: N/A (age 38 season upcoming)*
Edmonds: 20*
Ramirez: N/A (age 38 season upcoming)*
Of the 10 listed players (and again I hasten to mention that all are poorer hitters than Rodriguez, who is not incidentally also considered one of the best conditioned atheletes in the game), four hit at least 40 home runs beginning with their age 38 season. Of the remaining six, Griffey will return in 2010 and will almost certainly hit at least four home runs. Chipper Jones and Manny Ramirez - well, it’s anyone’s guess. I think Manny gets at least 40 more (probably well over 40) and Chipper does not. Giambi probably won’t make it, Edmonds has retired and definitely won’t, and Thome is currently without a team. Let’s say he doesn’t get there.
So out of ten comparables, six hit at least 40 home runs beginning at age 38, which again, is all Alex Rodriguez has to do.
Now, is it certain that all these things will happen? Of course not. But it’s silly to argue that it is anything resembling certain that they won’t, given how the careers of so many inferior hitters have played out. I’d say that Rodriguez has at least a 50% chance of taking the record, and - given his near pathological obsession with achievement and accomplishment - I’d bet my 401(k) that he will play as long as it takes to make it happen.
