Then your thread probably would have been better in General Questions, without all the controversial baggage.
But you mentioned this stuff in Great Debates, so you’re kinda expected to debate those topics you brought up.
Then your thread probably would have been better in General Questions, without all the controversial baggage.
But you mentioned this stuff in Great Debates, so you’re kinda expected to debate those topics you brought up.
Wait a minute! We get paid for posting? I remember when we had to pay to post. Now we’re the ones getting paid? Why was I not informed of this? Boy, someone’s gonna owe me for 12 years of posting.
I can’t wait for the OP’s next post about how melanin gives you superpowers and psychic abilities, and how white folks are mutant albinos.
Nm
I think it is entirely possible that certain human populations may share genes which can express themselves in undesirable ways under certain environmental conditions. Those populations may even share very distinctive outward appearance such as eye, hair or skin colour.
in case that wasn’t obvious.
At most 17% have blue eyes (this used to be as high as 50% in 1900, 35%, as recently as 1950 - “white genocide” is taking longer than ignorance fighting, apparently.). That article isn’t dated, but the use of “turn of the century” makes me think it’s at least a decade old, so I imagine it’s less than 17% now.
12.7% of Americans are African-American, plus whatever other Black Americans there are.
Miller gave numbers for Whites but their numbers ignore the number of AAs and Asian-Americans with blue eyes - not a high percentage, but should be counted.
I think it’s close, but I’d still bet there’s more blue-eyed Americans than Black ones.
You’re implying Crystal Gayle became an alcoholic.
(emphasis mine)
Could you repeat this again but a bit louder? I have a strong suspicion they’ll believe you over me. Otherwise, thanks for your post. I appreciate it.
But the cause there was infidelity, not racism.
Man, I need a drink!
Prohibition actually succeeded in markedly cutting down on drinking (and “alcholism”) in America.
Its biggest failure was not being able to withstand the demand for municipal revenue from booze taxes, once the Depression hit. Otherwise it probably would’ve lasted considerably longer, despite the sizable and noisy minority who hated it, and the boost it gave to organized crime.
Maybe it’s because of sunlight sensitivity?
OR, maybe it’s because many WASPS live in Wisconsin (cold and boring… what else is there to do)?
In any event. they probably don’t drink Colt 45
How do Wisconsin Penalties Differ from other States?
Your post contains several distorted facts and some outright nonsense. Oh, and writing the author only verifies that he, in fact, said something, not that what he said was necessarily true.
Both of the latter two numbers are very inflated.
“The spice Melange
It’s so cinnamon-sweet
I put it on 'most everything I eat
It’s addictive too
And don’t it make my brown eyes blue…”
-Tom Smith
I guess it depends on how you define several hundred but there is lots of evidence of distillation in Egypt in the second century CE and they were a beer drinking culture so it is probable that grain distillation is coming up on 2000 years. Depending on how you define grain the Chinese developed distillation during right around 0 CE but they were distilling rice wines which you may not choose to count.
There was a long lag between wine and beer development and seed spirits but unless you’re being incredibly generous with several hundred the OP is just wrong about spirits.
Do you have blue eyes?
As noted above that’s simple fermentation which is as old as the hills, not distillation which is a distinct method of producing spirits. It’s a bit murky, but widespread distillation of alcohol in Europe and Asia doesn’t seem to reach back earlier than the 12th century and depending on your definition of widespread we may be talking more like the 14th-15th. See here.