Well then, by your own assertion, because you and Sionnach are “exceptions”, you prove that White Nationalism is in general a hate-filled organization intent upon violence, intolerance, and wholesale disrespect for anyone it doesn’t perceive as “white”.
Do I need to embarrass you by reprinting here some quotes from your board, or will you concede the point?
Just wanted to provide a concrete example of something I said earlier regarding the white supremacists’ favorite example of media bias against white people:
Here’s the perfect example of that notion. A guy in Kansas used the Internet to find women who wanted to be his sex slaves, then killed them, chopped up their bodies, and dumped them in barrels. They found a total of five bodies, so he’s actually one higher than the Carr brothers, plus he’s got the freaky sex thing going on too. And what’s the result of all that in the media?
Significant local media coverage, and minor national coverage, of course.
The hell?? What does this have to do with anything? If it was proven (somehow) that white blood cells discriminate against red blood cells that still would have nothing to do with our discussion. The social dynamics of a social/religious/ethnic grouping has little or nothing to do with the amount of conflict and competition within a multicellular organism.
I do not believe that the “white” or Western worldview to be definitive for all Races. Whites are only a part of the human spectrum: a distinct part. A closed system within a multitude of systems. Systems that sometimes threaten to cancel eachother out.
Whites except for gay whites and Jewish whites, you mean, right? Are deformed whites and retarded whites excepted also? What about heterosexual toe sucking whites? They’re deviants, you know.
And for the record, if I jumped off the handle, then I jumped with you. It was your argument that I used. Fallacies are like that — they support purt near any argument.
And you need to try reading more than one author, since your comprehension of these topics is flawed. Meiotic drive is only relevant during gamete production (and even then can only act upon heterzygous alleles), and does not represent “conflict and competition…within the human body”. It does not affect the organism itself at all, but rather its offspring.
Which, of course, neglects the fact that this point, like so many others you have made, are completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.
There is no allegation of a worldwide conspiracy. We are talking about a group that pursues its own interest without a secret agreement among the members of the group.
The putative attempt to destroy the “white race” is most evident in Jewish efforts to force non-white immigration on historically white countries. The motive is quite clearly stated by Earl Raab.
Expressing his satisfaction with the Census Bureau’s prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace our people and culture in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
And this demonstrates a Jewish attempt to destroy the “white race”…how? Here’s a hint where to look for your latest logical flaw: that “whites” may become a minority does not demonstrate a decrease in overall “white” population.
Surely you understand the difference between relative and absolute figures. Just to show me that I’m not overestimating you, how about providing some numbers regarding the absolute decline of the “white” population.
No, wait, why don’t I do your homework for you. Here are the projected U.S. Census Bureau figures for whites from the five year period between 2001 and 2005:
WHITE
July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1,
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Population, All Ages 227,883 229,501 231,101 232,673 234,221
Summary Indicators
Median Age.......... 37.1 37.4 37.6 37.8 37.9
Mean Age............ 37.6 37.7 37.8 38.0 38.1
Five-Year Age Groups
Under 5 years....... 14,933 14,931 14,948 14,983 15,041
5 to 9 years........ 15,409 15,266 15,178 15,116 15,074
10 to 14 years...... 15,864 16,078 16,196 16,213 16,077
15 to 19 years...... 15,866 15,911 15,978 16,171 16,405
20 to 24 years...... 15,113 15,438 15,726 15,865 15,965
25 to 29 years...... 13,789 13,750 13,898 14,166 14,490
30 to 34 years...... 15,750 15,597 15,354 15,003 14,642
35 to 39 years...... 17,720 17,175 16,644 16,240 16,049
40 to 44 years...... 18,891 18,929 18,864 18,749 18,447
45 to 49 years...... 17,052 17,474 17,849 18,118 18,354
50 to 54 years...... 15,422 15,365 15,637 16,012 16,429
55 to 59 years...... 11,660 12,704 13,158 13,744 14,334
60 to 64 years...... 9,390 9,715 10,281 10,664 11,022
65 to 69 years...... 8,110 8,157 8,314 8,511 8,621
70 to 74 years...... 7,694 7,579 7,414 7,288 7,270
75 to 79 years...... 6,621 6,588 6,620 6,589 6,563
80 to 84 years...... 4,594 4,732 4,819 4,903 4,972
85 to 89 years...... 2,523 2,578 2,627 2,684 2,746
90 to 94 years...... 1,095 1,131 1,172 1,212 1,257
95 to 99 years...... 328 342 357 372 386
100 years and over.. 59 62 67 72 78
Hmmm…I’m just not seeing any supposed decline. How about we look ten years into the future:
WHITE
July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Population, All Ages 243,273 244,796 246,339 247,897 249,468
Summary Indicators
Median Age.......... 38.9 38.9 38.9 39.0 39.0
Mean Age............ 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.5
Five-Year Age Groups
Under 5 years....... 15,770 15,937 16,104 16,262 16,414
5 to 9 years........ 15,193 15,283 15,396 15,528 15,681
10 to 14 years...... 15,475 15,459 15,464 15,490 15,541
15 to 19 years...... 16,607 16,435 16,326 16,246 16,189
20 to 24 years...... 16,739 16,926 17,014 17,008 16,855
25 to 29 years...... 15,662 15,677 15,713 15,874 16,080
30 to 34 years...... 15,231 15,517 15,771 15,891 15,965
35 to 39 years...... 14,491 14,429 14,557 14,811 15,120
40 to 44 years...... 16,240 16,071 15,811 15,445 15,074
45 to 49 years...... 17,607 17,065 16,539 16,137 15,947
50 to 54 years...... 18,305 18,336 18,271 18,156 17,861
55 to 59 years...... 16,451 16,853 17,215 17,478 17,703
60 to 64 years...... 14,513 14,465 14,728 15,086 15,482
65 to 69 years...... 10,588 11,560 11,976 12,503 13,059
70 to 74 years...... 7,927 8,210 8,711 9,050 9,360
75 to 79 years...... 6,223 6,275 6,417 6,582 6,685
80 to 84 years...... 4,979 4,923 4,840 4,780 4,797
85 to 89 years...... 3,138 3,149 3,188 3,197 3,208
90 to 94 years...... 1,518 1,583 1,628 1,674 1,714
95 to 99 years...... 505 524 543 565 590
100 years and over.. 112 119 127 136 145
Still not seeing it. Let’s go even further out:
WHITE
July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1,
2075 2080 2085 2090 2095 2100
Population, All Ages 348,028 358,664 369,547 380,674 392,063 403,696
Summary Indicators
Median Age.......... 39.7 39.8 40.0 40.3 40.5 40.7
Mean Age............ 41.7 41.8 42.0 42.3 42.5 42.8
Five-Year Age Groups
Under 5 years....... 22,943 23,521 24,066 24,608 25,164 25,723
5 to 9 years........ 22,406 23,025 23,599 24,141 24,681 25,236
10 to 14 years...... 22,343 22,977 23,602 24,185 24,734 25,283
15 to 19 years...... 22,648 23,243 23,888 24,528 25,124 25,686
20 to 24 years...... 22,203 22,727 23,313 23,949 24,581 25,169
25 to 29 years...... 21,103 21,599 22,096 22,654 23,261 23,864
30 to 34 years...... 21,039 21,621 22,117 22,617 23,179 23,791
35 to 39 years...... 20,715 21,392 21,977 22,476 22,981 23,548
40 to 44 years...... 20,377 21,031 21,714 22,305 22,812 23,324
45 to 49 years...... 19,651 20,107 20,751 21,427 22,013 22,516
50 to 54 years...... 19,251 19,570 20,029 20,677 21,357 21,947
55 to 59 years...... 18,668 19,073 19,399 19,865 20,520 21,206
60 to 64 years...... 17,779 18,419 18,837 19,176 19,656 20,322
65 to 69 years...... 16,489 17,342 17,992 18,427 18,788 19,287
70 to 74 years...... 14,924 15,579 16,423 17,078 17,532 17,915
75 to 79 years...... 13,676 13,954 14,621 15,470 16,144 16,630
80 to 84 years...... 11,959 11,877 12,195 12,855 13,675 14,345
85 to 89 years...... 8,806 9,303 9,333 9,675 10,288 11,033
90 to 94 years...... 5,906 6,421 6,879 7,004 7,361 7,928
95 to 99 years...... 3,207 3,668 4,081 4,461 4,639 4,972
100 years and over.. 1,936 2,217 2,634 3,096 3,573 3,970
Nope. Still not gettin’ it. 98 years into the freakin’ future, and the white population is still increasing.
Which only goes to demonstrate that this “putative attempt to destroy the ‘white race’” is little more than fantasy.
Speaking of which:
I have underlined two perceptions which are not supported by Earl Raab’s quote, but are rather based entirely on your own bias and fear. A less paranoid interpretation of Raab’s comments is that when whites represent a national minority, you and your neo-Nazi brethren (note that he refers specifically to your group, not all whites everywhere) can kiss any hope of ideological, or actual, success goodbye. Which sounds like a good thing to me.
Hi, Veritas, welcome to the Straight Dope Message Board!
I just wanted to pop in to disect your last post.
All agreed there.
Yay. The evil Earl Raab. Who he?
yadda, yadda, yawn but then THIS!
Well great, that’s good isn’t it? If we’ve reached the point where a Nazi-Aryan party can no longer take over?
Maybe he is, he sounds quite scary this Prof. Raab. So, just remind me, who is he again?
Woah.
I didn’t read that interpretation. Prof. Raab sounds like a lively person (although I’ve never heard of him), but being lively isn’t always a bad thing.
In any event, you are drawing the wrong conclusion from the evidence. Based on the quote you gave it’s possible he was just commenting neutrally on the current population stats.
You seem to have interpretated that comment as “gloating” in some way? Maybe you have paranoia problems?
You mentioned “imagined threats to jews” in your quote, I think you need to consider “imagined threats” generally.
Jewish “efforts” to “force” non-white immigration?
You provide a statement from a person who is personally relieved that he and his grandchildren will not be threatened by a Kristallnacht or a Final Solution in his own land as if it was a deliberate effort on the part of some shadowy, nebulous group–after acknowledging that there is not even a conspiracy to begin with–and we’re supposed to accept your claim that somehow there are “Jewish efforts” at work, here? Does this mean that if I express relief, based on census projections, that my children will not have to face discrimination in employment or the fear that their churches will be burnt down by zealous Right wing Christians, that I am guilty of trying to reduce the number of Right wing zealot Christians, despite having never interfered in their lives in any way?
You have still failed to provide any evidence that:
there is an actual “Jewish” effort to do more than survive;*
that Jews are not “white” (or that they see some other group as “white”);
that there is any effort to destroy (or even harm) the “white” race;
or that there even exists a “white” race (given that we still do not know who are members of it).
*There are many people who promote and who oppose immigration. I have seen no evidence that this is directed in any way by “Jewish” efforts–and pointing to some small handful of Jews who happen to be pro-immigration is not going to cut it if I can find any similar group of “white” Protestants or Catholics or non-belivers who are also working to the same goal.
I don’t have time to wade through all his stuff to find out whether in fact he “appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis”, but I do have time to put “earl raab whites nazis” into Google, and what comes up is a review of Culture of Critique by one Stanley Hornbeck.
So, way to go, Veritas! You plagiarize Stanley Hornbeck, rewrite him a little bit, and present his thoughts as your own. Very creative. Let’s see that again:
And, hey, note that sly little misquote in the middle, where Stanley Hornbeck says, " He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock", you cleverly rewrote it to say, “He is apparently prepared to displace our people and culture”, in order to make it fit your Jew-hating agenda even better. Very resourceful. And hey, dig that addition and expansion, as to what Earl Raab actually said about the Census Bureau’s prediction–those two extra sentences just make all the difference, don’t they? Why, that Earl Raab must be one white-hating Jewish mofo, eh?
Asper’s charges of media bias 'bizarre’
By Doug Saunders
AFTER a long, angry speech by Winnipeg media mogul Izzy Asper, which accused most of the world’s media of being insufficiently pro-Israeli and implied that reporters are anti-Semitic, bewildered journalists yesterday struggled to respond.
Mr. Asper’s Wednesday night speech, which was reprinted prominently in his city papers and the National Post, effectively positioned Mr. Asper and his newspapers to the far right of most of the world’s major media.
As with speeches he delivered last month with former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, it repeated the Israeli Likud party’s conservative and aggressively anti-Arab views.
Jailed Jewish Defense League leader Irv Rubin hospitalized after suicide attempt
AP
Rubin and associate Earl Krugel were arrested Dec. 11 on charges of plotting to bomb the King Fahd mosque in suburban Culver City and an office of US Rep. Darrell E. Issa of California.
Rubin and Krugel were arrested after an FBI informant delivered an explosive powder that authorities believed was the last component in making pipe bombs. The charges carry up to 40 years in prison upon conviction.
Rubin, who by his own account has been arrested more than 40 times, joined the JDL early in the 1970s and quickly moved up, becoming chairman in 1985.
In 1989, the leader of the rival Jewish Defense
Organization was charged with firing shots at Rubin and wounding three others in New York. Mordechai Levy was convicted of assault.
According to his biography, Rubin learned to fight
anti-Semitism while growing up in Montreal, “where some hotel owners and other business people hung signs reading ‘No Dogs or Jews Allowed’ on their doors and where French Canadian schoolchildren taunted him because he was Jewish.”
His family emigrated in 1961 and he became a US citizen and joined the Air Force in 1966, serving four years.
In 1973 he served in Israel’s civil defense corps during the Middle East war.
The JDL, whose symbol is a raised fist inside a Star of David, has the motto “Never Again,” referring to the World War II killing of 6 million Jews. It was founded in 1968 by Rabbi Meir Kahane to mount armed response to anti-Semitic acts in New York City.
I have seen no one here argue that there are not loons and/or zealots within the Jewish community. However, what you have failed to demonstrate is that they are part of some all-encompassing movement. Based on your current arguments, we can conclude that all Presbyterians are attempting to destroy the Irish by observing the comments of Ian Paisley and his cronies or that all whites are attempting to subjugate all blacks based on the actions of some cowards in white sheets burning crosses on the property of black citizens.
Quite frankly, I will be happy when “we have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” In fact, I fervently hope we have already passed that point. If this means I favor the destruction of the white race, then I suppose I’d better start with my own family, because as literal White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, we’re about as white as you can get.
Also, with regard to the vast media coverage of the Carr brothers killing, I was amused to note that it was one of 5 national news stories my notoriously parochial local newspaper chose to give a one paragraph blurb to. The other 4 were Winona Ryder’s shoplifting trial, the suicide of a Jewish Defense League leader, the Catholic church’s sex abuse policy, and the D.C. area snipers.