White republican wins election by fooling black voters

This piece says Wilson won by a margin of 50.1% to 49.9%, by the way.

You can find a few images of his campaign materials online, but it’s hard to form a clear impression. Here’s one page, and here you can see parts of a few pages. While he talks about family values and hits his opponent for being single, I’m thinking he probably didn’t emphasize his criticism of the mayor of Houston (she’s a lesbian). It probably did help Wilson that the board has been hit by some scandals, so perhaps his opponent was seen as having some baggage. But I think the fake endorsement probably helped a lot.

He pretended to be someone else. I don’t think this could be any simpler.

It’s not stopping you.

Personally I think this is fucking hilarious.

Well, white American attitudes to blacks and Indians have historically not been quite the same. E.g., Thomas Jefferson looked forward to the amalgamation of whites and Indians into a single American race by intermarriage – and to the emancipation and deportation of all blacks to prevent the same (not that he shied from a little white-black miscegenation at home).

Besides which, nobody here is saying that we know why the race went the way it did, just possible reasons which might be why the race went as it did. Well, nobody here except you, Terr. You’re the only one in this thread who’s claiming to know absolutely what was going on there. Care to share how you know?

Who is the “someone else” he pretended to be, exactly? I didn’t even see him pretending to be black. He just didn’t emphasize that he was white.

I know. Let me throw out another possibility - maybe the black voters that cast the ballot for him actually wanted the “white, anti-gay Republican” for the office. After all, lots of whites voted for Obama, and no one finds anything weird about that. And quite a big proportion of blacks in this country are quite “anti-gay” as well.

He implied an identity distinct from his real one: he implied he was a black candidate with the support of Rep. Ron Wilson, and as far as I can tell he didn’t acknowledge his own run for mayor in 2011. People who are not clinging desperately to a “nuh uh!” argument will recognize that this was misleading and lying by omission. The candidate himself is open about the fact that he deceived people.

Black voters have been voting for white candidates since they received the franchise. White people who voted for Obama were clear on who they were voting for.

Time to emphasize that Wilson was running for a seat on the local community college board- not someplace his views on gays are likely to have much effect. After all he could have run on his own anti-gay record as white guy David Wilson.

“Implied an identity” does not mean “pretended to be” - does it? One is an omission while the other is an affirmation.

He implied an identity distinct from his own. Yes, that’s pretending to be a different person.

Wrong.

And now your argument has devolved to one-word rejoinders. Anyway Wilson is open about the fact that he was trying to trick people, so you may as well admit the same. Here, by the way, is Wilson’s latest website. There are no pictures of the candidate and no references to his anti-gay views or any other background. He was quite proud of his own history when he was running for mayor in 2011. And on the About Dave page there’s another photo that could be taken to imply he is a black man.

Of course he was. But he wasn’t trying to pretend he was someone else.

Right. So - if you have a web site where you do not enumerate every one of your views and don’t have a picture of yourself, you’re pretending to be someone else?

You mean the picture that is labeled “Students and Supporters of Dave Wilson”? Exactly how does it imply he is black?

He pretended he was a black guy named Dave Wilson, not the conservative white Dave Wilson who ran for mayor in 2011. This is not complicated, much as you might like it to be so.

A less than careful reader might think the lower picture has the students and supporters. Or they might simply assume the top picture is Dave Wilson with supporters even though it doesn’t say so. After all, what candidate wouldn’t put a picture of himself on his own website?

Show me where he “pretended” to be black. This is not complicated, much as you might like it to be so.

Ah. Assume. Even though it doesn’t say so. So some people (a bit on the less-than-brilliant side of the spectrum) assume he is black. He doesn’t say he’s black - anywhere on his web site or elsewhere. How exactly is that him “pretending he was a black guy”?

One that doesn’t want voters to decide not to vote for him because of his skin color?

How do you know they weren’t going to vote for him based on his skin color? He obscured his entire political track record as well as his race.

I don’t “absolutely know” - as I pointed out above, maybe his district’s majority black voters just decided they wanna vote for the white guy. My opinion is if they knew he was white they wouldn’t. But he didn’t want to give them the choice not to vote for him because of his skin color. Is that a problem for you?

As for “obscuring his entire political track record” - isn’t that what every person running for political office does, depending on what positions they deem to be favorable for re-election? It’s the standard MO - what is your problem with this particular case?

Have you ever seen pictures of Charles Curtis?

Yes, he may have been part Native American, and played it up for the sake of politics since Americans have ever since the Last of the Mohicans had a huge thing for white people with some negligible amount of Native American ancestry, but he didn’t look any more Native American than Chuck Norris, Kevin Costner, Quentin Tarantino or Elizabeth Warren*.

If Obama looked like this guy, who’s apparently also part sub-Saharran African you’d have a point, but he doesn’t so you don’t.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/11/craig-cobb-white-supremacist-black_n_4256360.html?ncid=txtlnkushpmg00000038

*. Yes, those names were chosen for a reason.

Still not what he did. And yes, I don’t approve of lying and bullshitting voters. The nice thing about not being a modern conservative is that I don’t have to choose between losing and stunts like this - either misleading voters by lies, omissions and fine print or trying to stop them from voting altogether. Unlike the Dave Wilsons of the world, I think people might actually willingly vote for the stuff I like. It’s a nice feeling.

No. That’s a good Dave Wilson impression, though!

The position is non-partisan, so no a D or R wouldn’t appear next to his name.