The Roman numbering system is older then the Arabic but did it have any operators? It appears the Roman numerals were good for years and numbers of things but cumbersome for math.
When the Arabic system came along was it developed along with the operators we know today or was it just a different way of numbering things instead of Roman and the math came later?
Or am I all wrong and complex math existed with the Romans or earlier.
The plus sign came first, between 1356 and 1361, and was an abbreviation for the Latin word et, meaning and. The other symbols evolved over the next few centuries.
The Babylonians used math, but it looks like it was done in grids, tables, and diagrams.
Nah, you can always just write out the word. “2 and 3 is 5”, “12 minus 4 is 8”. In fact, it is very likely that’s where “+” and “-” came from, as a shortening of the words “and” and “minus” (in various languages).
The Babylonians were doing addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, algebra, and trigonometry thousands of years ago without using operator symbols. The linked article describes how they did it using base-60 numbers and lots of lookup tables.
"expressed as? That’s the same thing, division, except the second one is not, or at least should not, be used, as @markn_1 notes.
That is a “square root”/“radical” sign, which I am not sure when it first appeared, however
The symbol was first seen in print without the vinculum (the horizontal “bar” over the numbers inside the radical symbol) in the year 1525 in Die Coss by Christoff Rudolff a German mathematician. In 1637 Descartes was the first to unite the German radical sign √ with the vinculum to create the radical symbol in common use today.
Taking decimal square roots by hand, well, maybe that is only still taught to very bored students?
Using an obelus as a division sign is rarely done past early elementary school. I don’t know why schools teach young kids this weird symbol that isn’t really used anywhere else.
The same is true for using × as a multiplication sign, although it’s used a bit more than the obelus, such as in scientific notation (like 6.02 × 1023), and in things that are similar but not the same as arithmetic multiplication, like vector cross products.
The Wikipedia article for long division says the sign composed of a right parenthesis combined with a vinculum (horizontal bar) is known simply as a “long division symbol” or “division bracket”.
The only time I ever see an obelus division sign any more is as a label on a calculator key. Oddly enough, when you press that key, the symbol that appears on the screen is still a fraction slash.
I know long division is still taught, because whenever I show my Algebra 2 and Precalc students polynomial division (which uses basically the same algorithm, because place-value numbers are themselves polynomials), at least a few of them still remember it. Of course, they’re all horribly out of practice at it.
As @Chronos notes, it’s still fairly common on calculator buttons.
It has the advantage of being an in-line symbol that unambiguously signifies division, as opposed to the slash, which is also used in dates (e.g. 6/13/2024) and/or other contexts.
In fact…
(Note: The following is my understanding, but it’s not something I’ve verified. I would welcome correction)
…the use of the slash as a division symbol, like the use of an asterisk as a multiplication symbol, started when people started typing math on computers. Since the * and / were already on the keyboard for their original uses, they were repurposed as operators, which saved having to add a new key to the keyboard and/or a new symbol to the ASCII character set. Before this, the obelus wasn’t “this weird symbol”; it was the way people wrote division as a binary operator.
Wikipedia says the slash to represent division “developed from the fraction slash in the late 18th or early 19th century.” So I don’t think computer keyboards had anything to do with it.
I see we’re talking about the difference in arithmetic and mathematics.
Same concepts but they use a few different symbols. Presumably to make it easier for young children to learn the meaning of numbers and how to use them.