Who writes spyware?

I’m hoping this has an answer, and so is a GQ…

I’m not talking about Gator and stuff, which while unpleasant is the creation of a legitimate company…I’m thinking along the lines of CoolWebSearch. I can’t find anything online except for how to remove it - I’m wondering where it originates from, and who is (presumably) making a lot of money from it.

Any ideas? Or is it all shrouded in Russian-mafia secrecy?

IIRC, Spybot can show you details on (some of) the spyware it finds in a scan. Sometimes those details has a website address for the company it comes from.

Who makes sypyware? Thats easy…Hackers

Just like thieves make the best locks.

>>>>>
Who makes sypyware? Thats easy…Hackers
>>>>>

Hardly. Hacker’s hate spyware too.
If you’re talking of adware…it’s programmers working for companies who write it. While people may not like it, adware is currently legal and extremely profitable.

But who are the companies? Since the OP, I realised that Google was filtering out all the ‘positive’ references to CoolWebSearch - but you can get to them via www. coolwebsearch .com (don’t try it with IE). But who are they? Where are they based - Florida, Caymans, Uzbekistan? Is anything known at all?

Yep. Whois reports the coolwebsearch site as being registered to InterWeb Solutions Inc. PO Box 326, Road Town, Tortola, IO, 65113.

Tortola is one of the Virgin Islands, btw.

Many of these companies keep themselves hidden behind multiple shell companies. The best way to find out who actually writes/distributes a particular one is to seach anti-spyware/malware sites. Many of them have ferreted out this information and make it available to you.

I look forward to the day when this stuff is outlawed.

CoolWebSearch claims they are not responsisble for any browser hijackers that may be placed by their affiliates. From their security page:

http://coolwebsearch.com/security/?country=US

I’m not saying I believe them, but this is their policy. Judging by how rapidly CWS mutates, I suppose it is reasonable to conclude it may be the work of many affiliates working independently rather than one company.

That’s like a company saying they manufacture guns but not ammunition. They manufacture a product that can specifically tag itself to a certain webmaster and the webmaster gets paid for every search hit to CWS. What further temptation is needed to make the ammunition (browser hijack) to fire the gun (CWS)?

The disclaimer is, of course, bullshit. CoolWebSearch is most certainly behind the hijacking (it happens if you visit their own pages – they don’t know about that?).

The CWS quote:
Maybe some webmasters, who are sending visitor traffic to us, are challenging your system’s security. We are not aware of this, nor are responsible for this.

What incredible bullshit. If some webmasters are challenging your system’s security, *“We are not aware of this.” *
If they are NOT aware of it, then why do they mention it?
Sheesh. Incidentally, if my SDMB name is wolf_meister, I am not aware of it. :rolleyes:

ARE there any movements to enact laws against spyware? If you ask me, this stuff is worse than spam and telemarketing put together!

Guinastasia
Yes spyware is really getting malevolent - it has almost destroyed my neighbor’s computer: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=259005
And that link connects to another link about that problem.

This is worse than telemarketing. At least when you are through talking with a telemarketer, your phone doesn’t blow up !!!

My computer is so jacked up from this bs right now that I’m gonna have to spend 60 bucks for some somputer tech to fix my computer back. :mad: not to mention the hassle of un-hooking my computer and taking it down to the shop.

The vast majority of spyware is written by questionably ethical private companies seeking to gather marketing information so they can sell it to questionably ethical private companies seeking to spam you with advertising.

However, a small portion of spyware is apparently written by or for the government; the FBI reportedly has a small arsenal of keystroke loggers and other such nasties that it has reportedly unleashed from time to time to gather evidence against child pornographers and against suspected terrorists. As far as I know, none of the evidence collected in this way has ever been used in court.