No not me but saw the result of a car getting together with a big 18 wheeler. The results are about what you would expect and pretty much the same as when a Gread dane gets together with a podel.
This is in NYC
Truck wants to turn left, but can only do so from the middle lane (which for straight travel).
Car in left most lane wanting to make left.
Both start into the turn and truck hits car mid-trailer and drags car 20 ft to a stop.
According to the truck driver:
Turn must be made from middle lane
Left signal was on
car tryed to ‘sneek through’ to get ahead of truck
A bunch of sanatation workers rushed over and agreed that the truck driver was in the right from the truck driver’s discription. But then again the NYC sanatation is known for diving big trucks around and hitting cars.
So even if we take the truck drivers word for it, I, personally, still see him being at fault because:
If he has to make the turn from the middle lane he should be darn sure that it is safe, this includes not cutting off cars legally turning from the left.
And if it was not safe he should continue straight to the next turn.
So I see the truck driver loosing by his own word. But I don’t know the law, Just common sense that if you are driving a multi tonn object you must use extra care. I would like to know, using the truck driver’s word as what actually happened who is at fault?
Also what happens if we add in the car drivers side:
Did not see signal (don’t know if the signal was on).
Did not try to beat out the truck, didn’t even realise the truck was turning.