Who's up on the early days of television?

I need a good TV history book, or some brains to pick.

Back when there were three networks – maybe four if your set picked up VHF (or was it UHF?) – I don’t remember shows being cancelled before the season was over. Were they?

Was TV more profitable, when a network could bank on getting at least a third of the audience? Did the networks have a pretty even share?

And I don’t remember reruns. How long have reruns been around? What was the reasoning for reruns in the first place? Was it because reruns were cheap or was it lack of programming? I do remember test patterns – we didn’t have 24/7 programming.

We’re talking 50’s, early 60’s TV. I have fond memories of it, but maybe that’s because it was so new. I remember liking everything! What happened to TV?

I thought you meant the really early days of TV - the early '50s!

There were definitely reruns during the time you mentioned - though fewer than there are now, since most shows bought enough episodes for an entire season, and only showed reruns during the summer (and maybe at Christmas - though specials preempted lots of shows then.)

Series did get cancelled, but pretty much only halfway through the year, so a few new series started in January. Batman started then, IIRC. There might have been a few exceptions for real dogs, but they were pretty rare.

Only three real networks, though big cities had local stations that showed syndicated shows or news. New York had 2 (CBS), 4 (NBC) 5 (Metromedia local) 7 (ABC) 9 (RKO), 11 (WPIX, owned by the Daily News) and 13, PBS sometime in the early '60s. When UHF TVs were mandatory, there were a few UHF stations from Long Island, and some educational channels. We didn’t have one until after the period you’re concerned with.

The networks did not have equal shares - ABC was almost always last. I think CBS was usually number 1 followed by NBC. I don’t remember reading about Sweeps back then, if so no one thought to program for it.

One more thing - I think a lot of shows started at 7:30. The local stations, IIRC, grabbed the last half hour from the networks because they made more money with local news and syndicated programming.

I’ve got some old TV guide fall preview issues in a box somewhere - if I ever find them that would tell you a lot, but I bet the old schedules are on the web.

Young people today. :rolleyes:

I thought you meant when all presenters had to wear dinner jackets.

'In another sign of the times, announcers on the new Home Service were no longer required to wear dinner-jackets for the evening shift. There is said to have been a sense that standards were slipping when one of them now took to occasionally wearing shorts. ’

'The home audience also heard or even watched Chamberlain’s return from Munich. Richard Dimbleby provided a live commentary for both radio and the BBC’s new television service - by then approaching its second birthday. ’

http://news.bbc.co.uk/aboutbbcnews/spl/hi/history/noflash/html/1930s.stm

Ooh, ooh, me, teacher, me! Let’s see if I can bring this in under 20,000 characters!

NBC started it all with 22 stations on July 1, 1941 just after the Federal Communications Commission ruled that 525-line electronic broadcasting would be the U.S. standard. It still is.

CBS and the DuMont network also showed programs on that date. Who? DuMont, the forgotten fourth network. DuMont sold television sets like like NBC’s parent company RCA and learned from RCA’s history that pushing software (content) was the best way of selling hardware (sets). (CBS later bought the Hytron Radio and Electronics Corporation and sold sets under the Columbia brand, but was never a big player.)

All television was shut down in April 1942 because of the war. Broadcasting resumed in 1946.

ABC now joined in along with Dumont but NBC and CBS were absolutely dominant. Very few cities could afford to have four networks. Even fewer had enough advertising dollars to support an independent as well.

One problem was that the VHF band is actually two separate bands, channels 2-6 and 7-13. Because of interference no more than two channels from the first band and three from the second could generally broadcast in a single area. And if your area was too close to another already in operation you had fewer options. Rochester, NY, where I grew up, had only a CBS and an NBC station until the late 1950s. They each showed a bit of ABC programming and also ran the forerunner of PBS - RAETA, the Rochester Area Educational Television Association - in the mornings.

Most of the country had similar situations. Almost every large city got both NBC and CBS. Small and medium-sized cities got one station or none at all. Larger cities had three networks, big cities had four or five, New York and L.A. had seven. Because of the interference problems, some independents started broadcasting on the UHF band. But few sets could receive UHF. It was a costly option until, IIRC, 1964 when the FCC mandated that all future tv sets made had to have a UHF tuner.

So let’s jump ahead to this question. Television doesn’t get its money from viewers, it gets it from advertisers. They pay more for more viewers so there’s a correlation but it’s not absolute.

And in the beginning NBC and CBS absolutely dominated. The split wasn’t one-third across the board, but more like 50-40-7-3. NBC and CBS had been the two dominant radio networks and had almost all the good shows. ABC actually started because NBC had two full radio networks, NBC-red and NBC-blue, and ABC bought NBC-blue when the network had to divest.

Then came the color wars. CBS was pouring all of its money into a mechanical system of color television. A mechanical system was obviously incompatible with electronic broadcasting, and NBC was working on an electronic color system, both in the late 1940s. CBS’s color looked better than NBC’s beta-tests but the future was in electronics.

So they cheated. CBS got the FCC to call a freeze on new station licensing in 1948 until they could get the issue sorted out. The freeze got extended through the Korean War and didn’t lift until 1953 when CBS capitulated, having used the five years to work on electronic color. For years NBC advertised its programs as being in “compatible color,” a phrase nobody understands anymore.

That meant that in addition to their huge head start, NBC and CBS prevented the other two networks from catching up for those crucial starting five years. Dumont folded in 1956, although they ran a number of programs that are today more famous in memory than because anyone saw them at the time, Ernie Kovacs primarily. ABC didn’t get the financial backing it needed to compete until the 1960s.

Profitability. Through most of the 1950s, corporations were the sole sponsor for a show. Indeed, they owned the shows outright and the shows were made and run by advertising firms for the corporations. The sponsors then paid the networks to run the shows.

They could do this because shows were fantastically cheap by modern standards. $10,000 could buy a full hour show, and that included all salaries and production costs. The networks got additional money, of course, but 30% or so of that went to the affiliates who carried the programs and another big chunk went to AT&T, whose phone landlines connected the various cities into a, ahem, network.

It was still good business for CBS and NBC, because half of an almost monopoly is nice to have. ABC and Dumont struggled because a partial chunk of a tiny chunk ain’t much.

The sponsors made out like bandits when the shows were a hit. All those stories, well most of them, about sponsors stopping their advertising because they couldn’t make enough product to fill demand from a popular show are true. The sponsors who couldn’t sell enough product dropped shows as fast as their contracts would let them.

Yes, many shows didn’t last a full season. A wonderful resource is Rick Mitz’s The Great TV Sitcom Book, which has at least a paragraph on every sitcom ever to be broadcast from 1949 to 1980. Take the 1950-1951 season. You’ve never heard of The Hank McCune Show, Menasha the Magnificent, The Peter and Many Show, The Ruggles, or That Wonderful Guy, none of which lasted a full season, even though the Wonderful Guy of the title was Jack Lemmon.

In the beginning, television followed the radio pattern: 39 weeks of original programming with a “summer replacement show” for 13 weeks. Partially this was due to the difficult of making transcriptions that lived up the original - no video tape until the mid-1950s, and few shows used it even then - and partially because nobody thought that audiences would sit still for reruns.

Syndicators, outfits that made shows on film and then sold them to stations for off-hour programming, moved into selling reruns of older filmed television shows in the late 1950s. Shows aimed at kids, like Superman, were pioneers because it was known that kids would watch their favorites over and over. (Superman’s creators also had the foresight to film the show in color starting in, I think, the second season, so it looked good on the growing number of color tv sets.)

As costs rose, the number of original episodes of a show dropped, with 26 being the new standard. If it was too expensive to make one original, it was too expensive to make two 26-episode originals, and it was hard enough to find one that was good enough. So the networks gradually started rerunning the shows they had already made, and found that a sizable audience existed. Since the shows were already paid for, even a smaller audience was profitable.

Smart producers, like Desi Arnez at Desilu, had already figured this out. He and Lucy owned their show - eventually buying a whole movie studio from the profits - and was one of the first to use filmed episodes as summer reruns. I Love Lucy’s success convinced others that the market was viable.

Your memories are selective. Most everything on tv was crap, just as it is today. Just as you (i.e. everybody) don’t remember those failed sitcoms, you don’t remember the failed westerns, the failed cop shows, the failed variety shows, the failed dramatic shows, the failed kiddy shows. We only remember the good stuff that lasted. Just as we’ll do in the future.

Books. I’ll just list some that I have at hand in my home library. Eric Barnouw’s Tube of Plenty: The Evolution of American Broadcasting, an abridgment of his three-volume A History of Broadcasting in the United States, is the standard history. It’s from 1975, around the same time that Les Brown put out Television: the Business Behind the Box. Tube: The Invention of Television, by David E. Fisher and Marshall Jon Fisher is newer (1996) and better. The earliest book about the industry in my collection (outside of some earlier technical books) is 1951’s The TV Jeebies, a light-hearted look at that strange new beast infecting the country, by Paul Ritts. Another fun one about the early days is a memoir by Kenneth Whalen, How the Golden Age of Television Turned My Hair to Silver. There are probably a million books with titles like A Pictorial History of Television and all of them have great pictures and memory-joggers.

Hope this jogs a few memories.

Which, of course, is not to be confused with the Beeb’s OLD television service.

Actually, in the 50s, most of the networks operated at a loss. They stayed in business because of the seven “owned and operated” (“O&O”) stations the networks were allowed to own were fantasically profitable.

One major factor in the death of the Dumont Network was that they weren’t allowed to own seven stations (Paramount, which was a big stockholder in Dumont also owned stations, and the FCC ruled that the Paramount-owned stations counted against the Dumont O&O total). ABC was able to muddle through despite weak revenues because the ABC O&Os subsidized the network even after CBS and NBC were making profits on network revenues alone.

Shows were generally run for 13-week minimums in the beginning. However, until the 60s, it was common to buy an entire season for a show before cancelling it, under the theory that it would be hard to promote a new show in its place. This had some good effects: The Dick Van Dyck Show started out with poor ratings its first season, and was actually cancelled by CBS, but during the summer, the reruns got a very good audience and CBS changed their mind. That is impossible today.

Some time in the late 60s-early 70s, someone (I think ABC) came up with the idea of the “second season”: where new shows were introduced in January to replace those that flopped in the ratings. By the late 70s, a show was given only a few weeks to find an audience before being cancelled. It’s not so bad these days, but ratings are still the major factor, and a real dog will be cancelled very quickly.

Wow. Very helpful. Thank you!

What does the future look like? I can easily see myself using the TV just for local news and sports, and getting my entertainment fix solely from DVDs. Are advertisers and marketers concerned about this?

That’s the other part I don’t understand – the financing. A production company makes a show, sells it to a network, and the network depends on advertisers to recoup their cost. Is that about right? Who gets the profits from DVD sales – the production company or the network?

You’re basically right: the Network pays the production company for the show, then makes money back on selling ads.

Most TV production companies do not make much money (and sometimes take a loss) on the original run of the series. They recouped with syndication sales, and, more and more, with DVDs. The networks don’t get any money from DVDs unless they were involved in production, and I’m sure any production company would refuse to produce anything for any network that asked for DVD sales.

As far as the future, who knows? There will certainly been plenty of real-time broadcasting since the economics dictates that: the first run would act as a promo for the DVD. Without the first run buzz, the DVD is going to flop.

More questions re advertising.

I read somewhere that (for example) Ford spends $1 billion a year on advertising. I don’t know how much of that is TV, but even if it’s 10%, it’s a lot of money.*

Does Ford get to specify which TV programs they’ll sponsor or does the network decide where to put the Ford ads? Can Ford say “Run this ad Sunday during Desperate Housewives but not on Tuesday during Boston Legal?”

I know sponsors can withdraw ads for controversial shows – that’s always boggled my mind, wondering what kind of contracts allow for that. “I promise to pay you $$ to air my ad unless you do something with it that I don’t like.” How does that work? The networks have budgeted the sponsor dollars, contracts signed, etc. Does the network keep the money and place the ad elsewhere?

*Which also makes me wonder why they don’t own programs like they used to. They can afford it, they’d have control, and if product placement wasn’t overdone, viewers might not object.

Ford spends at least a half billion a year on television advertising. For some reason I can’t find later numbers than these from 2002 but with $437 million just on network tv, Ford’s a big spender.

But they can’t afford to own programs like they used to. The economics are all wrong.

A 30 second commercial for a highly-rated but not even top-rated program costs about $500,000. With a volume discount that would run about $5,000,000 per episode or $110,000,000 for a standard 22-episode season.

That’s one quarter of Ford’s entire network advertising budget. And what would they get for it? About 10% of the total viewing audience at any one time. And they would get the same audience show after show for the entire season, assuming that people wouldn’t shoot their television sets before then. (Don’t forget the costs of producing all those ads, because you can’t run the same ads every single week.) How much more effective would this expense really be than buying one commercial each episode on this show and nine more on nine other different shows with different demographics? Not at all more effective. Much less so, in fact. It would be even worse if Ford were paying to create the show as well. Studio 60 is running about $35 million for 13 episodes, so say $60 million for 22. I’d fire anybody who gave me these numbers.

Sponsors could own shows in the early days because everything was so cheap. Even by the end of the 1950s that had changed. What they call magazine advertising - the practice of running many different ads in blocks - became the norm because nobody could afford anything else, except in the most special of cases. (Hint, Disney.)

Contracts for major advertisers can get very specific. Someone like Ford can and does specify exactly when the ads will run, down to the individual advertising block. And every major advertiser has an out in every contract saying that they can pull advertising at any time because of what the commercial will air adjacent to. The network has to make up the time elsewhere or give back the money. That’s the overriding reason why the networks are so timid about programming.

They’re panicked to the point of hysterics. But they’re worried too early, IMO. I can’t see all those millions of people who are rushing out to buy 50 inch HD plasma televisions dumping television. The name is in the product! I just bought myself a 50 in. plasma. The picture from the HD stations is phenomenal, better than a movie screen. And that’s the real draw. The only place you can get a 1080i signal to show off the HD picture is from a high-def channel. You can only get 480* line signals from DVDs and that won’t change much for years because of the format wars between HD-DVD and Blue-Ray. Nobody except for a few gadget freaks is going to take the chance of sinking thousands of dollars into a format and have it become obsolete if the other format wins. Cable (including satellite) will be the only place to get true HD for years to come, maybe a good decade. Yes, they already make sets that can be networked into the computer system but HD downloads of movies are also years away given current bandwidth restrictions.

Besides, during any given week probably 150 million Americans watch network television and more watch cable. Movie attendance isn’t a tenth of that. Can you really fill up your weekly viewing with just DVDs? If so, you’re very unusual.

Television won’t go before books do. Both have years of life yet, even if the exact pattern of that life is impossible to predict.

*Isn’t this lower than the 525 lines I said tv has? Not really. Because of signal restrictions broadcast tv actually runs no more than about 330 lines. DVDs do look better. But 1080i high-def is breathtaking. As long as you get HD stations free (or as a part of the HD cable package) nothing else will compare. The networks broadcast much of their prime time schedule in HD and more stations become available all the time. That’s a huge draw.

I missed this. Tube in a 1995 quote has Richard Solomon, associate director of MIT’s Research Program on Communication Policy, saying:

As William Goldman keeps saying to the point of mania, “nobody knows anything.”

Well, yes, but networks preferred the magazine advertising primarily because they could make more money from it: they could sell more ad time.

Thanks again. You have given me much to think about.

You might say it was win/win. They didn’t have any choice, but the result worked out better for them.

There simply was no way in the world that the sponsor-owned show was going to survive until the 1960s in any case. The quiz show scandals killed that puppy dead.

The NBC television network was not inaugurated until June 27, 1947, and even then it had only five stations: New York, Philadelphia, Schenectady (NY), and Washington.

According to the very website you linked to, the DuMont network didn’t start up until 1946:

Not so. What happened was that from April 1, 1942, to October 1, 1945, manufacturing of radio and television hardware for civilian use was suspended. Television broadcasting was never suspended, nor even limited. The FCC did drop the minimum required air time for commercial television licensees from 15 hours per week to 4 hours per week, but that was a minimum, not a maximum. Television stations could have stayed on the air 24 hours a day during the war for all the FCC cared. Many commercial licensees went off the air during that period for want of equipment or engineering personnel, or because television operations were money-losers.

A program guide from the New York DuMont station for the week of January 28, 1945.

A few wartime television series:

Cavalcade of Sports
Missus Goes A-Shopping
Voice of Firestone Televues
The World in Your Home

And a few wartime specials:

A Christmas Carol
Abe Lincoln in Illinois
The Bourgeois Gentleman
Sham

NBC began televising sports and entertainment events from Madison Square Garden in October 1943, chiefly for the enjoyment of servicemen in New York area hospitals.

WBKB became Chicago’s first commercial television station in October 1943.

Actually, the FCC chose the CBS color system as the U.S. standard on October 11, 1950, and after a delay caused by an unsuccessful lawsuit from RCA, CBS color programming went on the air in June 25, 1951. It went nowhere because virtually no one had a color television set, and the programming couldn’t be watched on standard black and white sets. CBS pulled the plug on their color broadcasting in October 1951.

The FCC’s station licensing freeze was lifted on July 1, 1952.