Well, yes: they’re the only citizens of a developed and generally pacific country to view cops as the enemy and lawyers as prophets rather than as helpful people and dudes with a degree in pushing paper, respectively.
Oh come on, we don’t hate them ! We just think they’re by and large a bunch of drunken, racist, barely literate power-tripping assholes who love nothing more than splitting protesters’ skulls and harassing the poor.
But other than that, they’re a fine body of men and women.
Very close to the mark, I think. I long for the day the far right is viewed with suspicion here and criticism for missing flag pins is considered tacky.
Naturally of course, hence the need for a sensible, progressive form of nationalism that is genuinely respectful of the national heritage while not falling prey to the jingoists. I personally consider myself a social democratic nationalist and my belief in social democracy and American nationalism are intimately related in that regard-it is because I care for the greatness and prosperity of my nation that I believe that social democratic policies will secure a decent livelihood for its citizen body as nationalism should not just be concerned with the nation in the abstract but with the good of the actual people that make it up and without which the nation cannot exist.
Maybe also the US had a very distinct profit/loss return from WW2. For the loss of, what, 300,000 (Stalin had that many Soviets shot - just loose change) the US got to see itself as a saviour sitting atop a huge moral mountain, and at the same time grew an empire and an ever burgeoning economy: war is good.
Perhaps for the US, and the British Empire before it, a necessary condition of imperialism is ongoing moral conviction, and irrational patriotism - which is what we witness now - is part of that.
It’s always interesting to hear the tone of a Presidential address, how it invites '‘Americans’ - used in every other sentence - to invest in whatever the moral journey might be on this occasion.
It probably helps if the would-be empire’s home territory isn’t threatened. As soon as it is, a large chunk of the population will flip from imperialists to isolationists (or perhaps more accurately, the isolationists will be taken more seriously).
Just spitballing, of course. I’m sure counter-examples are numerous.