[QUOTE=Sam Stone]
While the airplane actually gets decent mileage, you are going a LONG way. 17,000 km is farther than I drive in a year.
So, the comparison is:
Person A has a luxury which burns 240L of gas in a year.
Person B has a luxury which burns 240L of gas in a year.
Which one is worse? Obviously, they’re the same. But there are a lot of Person A’s running around who drive a Prius or a little Honda Fit or something, but jet around the globe for fun, and a lot of person B’s who own an SUV because they find it makes their life better. the Person A’s tend to do a lot of criticizing of the Person B’s. They should not throw stones.
[/QUOTE]
As I said, a truly retarded argument unless you’re arguing that the SUV driver gives up all his other gas-consuming luxuries in favor of the SUV. Me, I’d be guessing the kind of person who can afford a 10 or 15 mpg SUV and be damned-to-expenses is gonna be taking a whole lot of more foreign trips than I am.
But let’s examine your retarded argument:
a. Going to London. But one which is taken using the most efficient form of transport available. A form of transport which, because it’s carrying cargo and business passengers, is going to be going there anyway. (The more passengers, the lower the fuel cost/passenger.)
b. Driving an SUV. A luxury. But one which, for many people, there are many, many reasonably alternatives, many of which are cheaper, better for the environment, and more considerate of those sharing the road with the driver.
So, I dunno. I’m leaning towards (b) being a rationalizing, inconsiderate, selfish dickhead. But that’s just me.