Per this Snopes link that indicates Mr. Ed was in fact a Zebra, and that he (female zebra actually) appeared to be a whitish mono-colored horse on 60’s B&W television because of the limitations of technology. Why couldn’t television resolve closely integrated black and white images. Zebra and referee stripes are pretty distinct. What was it about them that gave older B&W broadcast television fits? Mister Ed was a zebra
Yeah, that’s actually from their page of “Lost Legends,” which are considered too dubious to be believed. I’ve always thought it was a stupid and irresponsible part of their site, though.
I saw an episode of Mr. Ed with a zebra. It was that classic sitcom bit where they get three or four bilingual people to translate a conversation down a chain, back and forth. Wilbur needed to talk with some kind of African monkey, I believe, and since the Zebra was both African and horse, it was the link between Ed and the monkey. They had to break into the zoo to do it.
Mr Ed was made in the 50’s, when American race relations were not all that great. It was unheard of to show mixed marriages, interracial relationships, etc. By showing a zebra, it would be like television was condoning sex between a black horse and a white horse. I believe Sheena, in the 80’s, was the first to lend legitamacy to such unions.
Oh… :o . I thought it seemed well…odd which is why I asked the question. I was just bopping around Snopes and treating it all like gospel and not reading the category header line by line. Wished they’d made it a little more upfront.
Oh well.
[Emily Latella Voice] Never mind![/Emily Latella Voice]
Well I thought it was odd which is what prompted the question.
I have never seen a televised football game in black and white. I was raised overseas and didn’t really get back to the US full time until 1968 so lies about the technological limitations or idiosyncrasies of B&W broadcast television have in me a bottomless well of credulity to plumb.
In all honesty I was just speed cruising the Snopes reference site and per the cited Mr. Ed example didn’t really read much beyond the “zebra” part of the story which prompted the question about B&W TV cameras. I didn’t read the referee section word for word.
I really couldn’t understand logically how B&W cameras could not resolve closely spaced black and white stripes. It just didn’t make logical sense to me which is why I asked the question. If I had had paid more attention to the details the absurdity of the claim may well have become evident but I was trusting that the Snopes example was valid because I was taking Snopes from granted as authoritative. Snopes warning about trusting authority (even themselves) even when the facts seem off the beam is quite correct.
If you reverse this though, I have been told that one of the reasons snooker (pool/billiards whatever) was originally put onto television was the BBC was looking for a sport that only made sense on a colour TV set to help boost the switch from B&W.
…and in my favorite story from Snopes ever, a real live urban legends TV show pulled one of the stories from the “Lost Legends” page and ran it as true.
What most people don’t realize is that due to the lighting techniques on a set, a real horse would have looked nothing like a horse. So to get Mr. Ed to look like a horse, they actually had to tie a bunch of dogs together.
What I don’t understand is how they handled traffic back then. Before color was invented, how did people know when to go at a stoplight?
Seriously, though, there is a phenomenon called “strobing” in which closely spaced stripes (not necessarily black and white) are poorly resolved, and appear to flicker disconcertingly. Of course, this makes them more conspicious, not less.
On TV you can get a good example of this by watching pro golf, actually. A lot of the golfers wear shirts that, due to the resolution of TV broadcasts, flicker and do other bizarre image-things for those of us viewing at home. Craig Stadler supposedly does it on purpose.