We asked you first.
Particularly ones dismissed as “living in caves”.
You would prefer to argue about whether your argument is vague or not rather than defend and explain the meaning of certain elements of it? I’m not sure the 911 non-nut-jobs would appreciate someone of your diplomatic calibre speaking on their behalf.
To clarify, ‘a couple’ in itself is not vague, no. It means two. So who came into power two months before 911? Either recognise your error or name the group.
Presumably you’ve neither just sprang into existence a month ago nor been living under a rock for quite some time, so I imagine an answer to this end shouldn’t be too difficult?
Of course I can; you’re using it as a weak rhetorical device that has zero application here and even less value of analogy outwith a precursor to war context.
Now, why don’t you tell us what you think it means?
None. And how many times has the US gone to war without a ‘Pearl Harbor’, ever?
I can’t believe I am going to defend truthers, but I can’t remember ever hearing a statement that middle easterners in general live in caves.
Just that the USA the most powerful nation on earth has spent trillions of dollars fighting religious extremist militants that were supposed to be hiding and operating in caves, with the implication that it is mostly corruption.
Not in general. Just the terrorists, the implication being that they’re too dumb and/or technologically backwards to have pulled off 9/11.
To be fair, such a mentality is typically limited to racist twoofers. You know, the ones who refer to Islamic terrorists as “towelheads”.