Why do months have names but not weeks?

I find this thoroughly unfair, and hereby vow to correct this injustice.

I haven’t done much thinking about this, to be quite honest, and so no names have been decided upon, other than my decision to refer to the current week as Logust. Furthermore, days will now be referred to solely as Monday, Tuesday etc. No more of this silly 1st of January numbering rubbish. Thus, today is Wednesday of Logust.

I firmly believe that this will be not only a more just system, but also a far more confusing one.

GQ-ish reference in case you’re genuinely curious and want to learn more about the nature of the week.

This guy’s books are interesting.

Why Logust now? Wouldn’t it make more sense for August- Lagust, Legust, Ligust, Logust, and Lugust? Lygust as well if necessary.

Well, sometimes.

Now you’re just thinking inside the box. I want to do away with months entirely. Even so, I like your suggestions and will probably use some of them sprinkled through the year.

To clarify: making sense isn’t the primary purpose, rather the opposite. I want the confusion.

Didn’t the Romans do something similar with the Ides, Nones, Kalends, etc.?

Why not go by the lunar calendar, while you’re at it, rather than the solar calendar? Year of the Bull coming up, you know.

I want to use the system they use in Ankh-Morpork!

Join the Catholic church, they have names for all the Sundays and some other days too. You could expand that to the week, i.e., 3rd week after Pentecost, etc.

Okay, if we’re going with extra confusing, I demand there’s a week called “Next” right before a week called “Last.”

And by demand, I mean, suggest.

Use the French Revolutionary Calendar, and then the months consist of three weeks of ten days, although the weeks are technically numbered. Still, unique names for every day of the year!

tlh, né le mois de Floréal, troisième decade, jour de duodi (la bourrache)

Then why stop with weeks? I propose that every minute has a unique, non-repeating name.

I plan to implement this plan on Zorbamorphamackindaddywombatrombadoodle.

You could go with the French Republican Calendar. It has a name for every day of the year.

Nevermind, beaten to the punch.

I know the OP was about naming the weeks and not about alternative calendars, the Tranquility Calendar has always stuck in my head since I read about it on Omni magazine a couple of decades ago.

Ok, surely someone else read the subject and had the thought, “Of course months have both names and weeks.”

Carry on.

That… actually makes sense. Actually, that calendar makes a lot of sense. Holy moon-shit, Astro-man!

Remembering fifty two names could be tricky.
Hello mum me and the kids are going to visit you in Colonweek…
Er thats wk49 isn’t it?
No wk49s eczemaweek…

Are you sure ?I thought Colonweek was 23…

And so on.

It’s not names, but in Scandihoovia weeks are numbered on calendars. For instance, in this area kids always get their autumn break from school in Week 40.

I’d say the boring reason is that people can easily memorize a sequence of 12 names but would have more difficulty with a sequence of 52. Hell, we number the days of the month, and there are no more than 31 of those.

  • 52 weeks a year is no good. Too damn many names to remember, unless you’re some kind of obsessive-compulsive.
  • 4 weeks a month is no good either. Except for non-leap Febs., there’s always a few extra days at the end.

A week is unlike a day or a month because it is a strictly relative measure, a scheme to organize days. Yes, yes, you say, aren’t all time periods just part of a similar scheme? True. But days and months are a lot easier to use when you want to point to a fixed reference - January, for example, or Friday the 9th. Saying “the 2nd week in January” is still a lot easier than calling it Capricornus Tertius or Lizzie’s Flannels or whatever.