Aesthetics aside, I fail to find many practical reasons for the use of “wall-to-wall” carpeting. However, I’ll list the few practical purposes that come to mind.
[ul]
[li]insulation against sound, vibration, and low temperatures[/li][li]hiding / protecting hardwood flooring that you intend to preserve and / or eventually restore[/li][li]comfort for bare / stocking feet, walking, and small children.[/li][li]cost[/li][/ul]
Are there more **practical ** reasons to use complete carpeting?
(OTOH, Area rugs and mats seem to have much more practicality, IMHO.)
I am not the germophobe type, but carpeting is a formidable haven and breeding ground for infinite forms of nastiness. I think it’s safe to speculate that even the most powerful carpet shampooing devices won’t remove and destroy 100% of said atrocities.
Hard flooring materials just seem more practical, to me. Of course, I realize that hard flooring is not going to reach “sterility” upon cleaning, either. I do assume that hard flooring can become much cleaner than carpeting, though.
It would be interesting to know the percentage of cleanliness that the various types of floor coverings can achieve, via comparitive analysis: e.g. ceramic tile vs. hardwood vs. vinyl / linoleum vs. carpeting, etc. I’m not sure what precise method of measure would be used. Hypothetically speaking, something like “x” amount of bacteria, mold, debris, etc. per “y” amount of space.
I live in a 77 year old home that has hardwood flooring. I think it’s much more elegant than any carpeting, but that’s just my personal preference.
I do note that hardwood flooring is supposed to be a big plus when selling a home. If we have any real estate people here, you may correct me / back me up on this note.