Are those prescription? Or are they available over the counter? I’m not gonna need to find a guy, am I? Because those sound like the ideal way to get thru the next 4 years.
Nothing there indicates the Russians did anything. If I issue a statement that I am confident Hillary may have personally directed the physical attacks on the Trump supporters, it would just be opinion, not proof. To make a case one has to show that something happened, how it happened, and prove X perpetrated it.
Well, at least with Trump they can dismantle the recent mass preparations for war caused by Hillary’s dumb adventurism; Russians are deathly scared of Nuclear War.
Of course Americans can say ‘You will be perfectly safe so long as you give in on all points and do life our way as we tell you too.’ as usual, but not everyone can roll over.
Current reports suggest that that’s not what they’re saying at all. And as for Russian governmental interference in the US election there’s not one iota of evidence that it happened, which is why you’re hearing very little about it in the media now. It was a device used by the Democrats (and their allies in intelligence) to try to discredit Trump. It didn’t work and now it’s been dropped.
Absolutely. 3000 people is a drop in the bucket. I’ve seen estimates that say 9/11 cost the US $2T, but mostly that seems like a lot of stock market funny money accounting and lost revenue rather than costs.
I support Trump because he’s less likely to lead us into a war with Russia.
I seem to recall that, 4 years ago, Mitt Romney was widely mocked by the Left for saying that Russia was America’s biggest foe. President Obama smirked, “The Eighties called- they want their foreign policy back.”
Remember the giant RESET button Hillary brought out 8 years ago, suggesting that Bush had ruined relations with Russia, and that we were going to be friendlier now?
After 8 years of claiming Russia no longer posed a threat, Obama and Hillary couldn’t very well argue that Trump was a traitor for cozying up to Putin, could they?
Releasing a few untampered documents that one of the criminals up for election doesn’t want released isn’t “dictating US policy”. Neither of the candidates had any say in US policy at the time, and telling the truth about one of them is hardly “dictating” anything.
I’m as pissed as anyone that Trump won, but let’s not go spreading lies. He won fair and square (assuming gerrymandering and voter suppression laws are “fair”, as they have been considered since 1789 – and either way, Americans made those laws, not Russia).
Also why do you say there is no evidence? Why did the agencies come to the same conclusion, and why do you expect them to publicize national security information?
The acting NSA chief said Russia hacked the US elections.
Do you and the other conservatives feel you know more about this issue than the NSA chief? If so, why do you believe that?
I’d like to think so - but sadly not. Yep, proto. Having said that, Russia is in a kind of Downton Abbey period, that early democracy/early capitalism phase where strong leaders either do, or don’t, hold the whole together.
Another version is Tonto-capitalism. That one involves a lot of horses and chasing indignant folks off their land