Pardon me if I hold Bernie to a higher standard than Trump. I want to vote for the guy if he’s the nominee, with or without holding my nose.
Both Bernie and Warren are in their seventies, Bernie has a heart condition, and Warren looks like she might have an “irregularity” into her pants at any time.
Even if he knew, he shouldn’t be speaking up about it. Getting specific for stuff like this is bad political strategy. It’s one of the reasons I think he’s most likely to beat Trump - he keeps it broad and vague, with big, simple, easy to understand goals. I think he’s, sneakily, a skilled, savvy, and even ruthless pol, and that’s one of the reasons I’m rooting for him.
Bernie is the most-liked Democrat in the field, among Democratic voters. No wonder he’s winning.
Buttigieg (38) is the, stand alone, youngest person on the stage. Klobuchar (59), Steyer (62), Warren (70), Biden (77), Bloomberg (78), and Bernie (78) are all older then Obama (58) who’s already four years into his presidential retirement.
I think it skews this way because of how Trump (73) is also so damn old so these attacks cancel each other out.
Bernie Sanders’s rise has moderate Democrats wondering if it’s too late to stop him: Bernie Sanders' rise has moderate Democrats wondering if it's too late to stop him | CNN Politics
I suspect it is.
Sure, twist the What Have You Done With Your Life knife some more…
Here in California, we always lamented that here in the most populous and most diverse state in the country we always have our primary too late to have an impact. So we finally got smart, and moved our primary from June to March. And its still too late.
“The revolution is coming, and it is a very beautiful revolution. It is beautiful because, in its deepest sense, it is quiet, gentle, and all pervasive. IT KNOWS.”
- Bernie Sanders (capitalization his)
[the revolution comes] “When a girl pushes aside all that her mother “taught” her and accepts her boyfriend’s love.”
In the same essay Bernie explains that if only little children were allowed to run naked and look at and touch each other’s genitals, sexual repression and the porn industry would be destroyed.
The Revolution is Life vs Death
The man is whackadoodle crazy. And he’s left a paper trail a mile long full of this craziness. Wait till you hear the one about how female orgasms can cause cancer.
The Democrats and media failed to vet him for fear of angering their base or giving Trump ammunition. So almost no one knows about Bernie’s crazy past. But you can bet Trump is sitting on a mountain of oppo research, and he’ll be hammering ‘crazy Bernie’ constantly. And he’ll have the documents to show it.
Ron Morrison of the Doors, eh?
None of this is nearly as awful, nor as crazy, as stuff Trump has said just in the last few years. If this kind of stuff really matters, then it will matter for Trump as much or more than for any opponent.
That’s assuming zero wisdom about the demographics the parties draw. If a random politician offends college educated women, do you really think it’s the same thing for a Dem as a Republican?
We’re talking about “gettable” voters. If they really care about this kind of thing, they’ll vote Sanders, because what he said was decades before, and wasn’t even as bad as what Trump says now. If they don’t care about this kind of thing, they’ll vote based on some other factor.
Or at least that’s my guess. We’ll see.
Americans who want socialism < Americans who want Trump/racism/‘owning the libruls’ + Americans who don’t want Trump but also don’t want socialism.
That’s a problem.
Bernie fans tend to equate adoration of Bernie with being a person who thinks that the current system is unjust and ultimately unworkable. But, again, the math doesn’t check out:
People who want change in the current system > People who think Bernie is The Answer
…by several orders of magnitude.
This is my opinion, obviously. But I will point you again to the fact that Bernie is getting tens of thousands of votes FEWER in 2020 than he got in 2016. ** Again, hand-waving this away is foolish, given that his main selling point is “enthusiasm.”** If people were all that enthusiastic, wouldn’t he be getting at least as many votes in 2020 as he got in the same primary races in 2016?
I just think you are in the wrong decade. Everyone who thinks bernie is the best bet doesn’t “adore” him. I can’t even get how adoration comes into it. I adore things that should not be potus. That’s where my adoration always winds up.
This whole thing about accusing some of adoration of bernie is related to the “they hate trump” choruses that the incipient fascists started echoing as soon as they got in and made moves against democratic norms. It’s a strategy. Everyone is projecting too much.
I don’t agree about vote totals, even the second time around.
I thought you had mostly been pumping Bernie because of the enthusiasm of his base. Now you’re talking swing voters?
And I’m sorry, some of the shit in his old essays don’t lose their impact with aging. I thought you were the biggest #metoo guy around here.
And it was perhaps not clear: I meant some of that stuff could push down female Dem turnout, not make them vote Trump.
I dunno… talking about wanting little children to run around naked and touch each other’s genitals to ‘liberate’ them is pretty ‘out there’. And the notion that women can help bring about the revolution by spreading their legs for their boyfriends against their better judgement seems pretty awful.
But if this stuff doesn’t bother you, just wait. Bernie has written many such columns, and they’re all pretty crazy. Bernie is presenting the Trump campaign with a target-rich environment.
In 2016 he only had one opponent, not 6.
Oh, come on. Did you even read the article? Look, I’m not a Sanders fan. He’s the Democrat I least wanted to see get the nomination. But here’s what he said 51 YEARS AGO in the Vermont newspaper you linked:
Despite your efforts to twist it, it’s clearly not advocacy for child porn. It’s saying that policing people for tiny infants wearing nothing but diapers is ridiculous, and that reading sexuality into babies’ behavior is the same kind of nonsensical and unhealthy repression that made the porn industry so lucrative back then. I don’t know if you were around in 1969. I was. It was a time when all sorts of boundaries were being pushed, among them the rigid mores of the 1950s.
So…you think a mother who lets her baby wear nothing but a diaper at a public beach SHOULD have been reprimanded?