Why I Miss Baseball

This isn’t a GQ, or a GD; there’s no question here, and I don’t want to argue right or wrong. I just want to mourn the game I loved, and I’m mildly curious as to whether anyone else feels the same way. Hence the following.

It’s the beginning of another baseball season, and it’s finally gotten to the point where I’ve said: so what? After 35 years of being a baseball fan, it’s lost its appeal. Like I said up top, it’s the beginning of the season, but I miss the game.

What this is not about:

It’s not about the money. Yes, I think MLB players are seriously overpaid, and I’m tired of the owners jerking every ML city around for a stadium with luxury skyboxes and whatnot. But that’s not it.

It’s not about postseason games that take far too long, and end way too late, although it certainly wouldn’t hurt if baseball went with a more Masters-like approach to their crown jewels, with fewer but more expensive commercials. Football, basketball, and hockey have such frenetic action that a commercial break is a necessary breather. Baseball is the right pace to begin with (many would say too slow already, but I’m not one of those); put in too many too-long breaks, and you’ve got a snoozefest, particularly a MLB playoff game at 11:30 pm when the alarm goes off at six in the morning.

But the postseason is such a brief part of the arc of the season; that’s really not it, either.

It’s not the DH, or the extra layer of playoffs (although the first round is far too much baseball at once, IMO), or monkeying around with the divisions for (about to be) the third time in less than a decade, and having teams switch leagues for (soon to be) the second time in three years, after its having happened precisely never, until now. And it’s not interleague play, which I’m all for, actually. (I’m not exactly a hidebound traditionalist here.)

No, it’s none of that. It’s this: I miss pennant races.

We don’t have them anymore, at least, not for serious. And over the arc of a 162-game season, that’s what made the game compelling, that’s what made it matter. If you have a month of spring training, six months of regular season, and a month of postseason, what’s the heart of the game? The regular season. And what’s captivating about the season? Pennant races. Or that’s what used to be captivating, anyway.

Remember when the Red Sox led the Yankees by 14 in 1978, then blew it all to fall 3-1/2 behind, then somehow picked themselves off the floor to tie the Yankees on the last day of the season to force a 163rd game in Fenway the next day, with the season riding on the outcome - damn, that was hard. Or when the Braves (104-58) and the Giants (103-59) went down to the wire in 1993, the Last Pennant Race Ever.

What made those races so compelling? What about checking the results from some late ballgame out on the West Coast made me feel like a junkie getting his fix?

A very simple thing, IMHO: the fact that the winner kept on playing, while the loser went home.

This is what we didn’t have in 1996 or ‘97, for instance, when the Orioles and the Yankees were involved in two ersatz races in the AL East. If the team that led most of the way had fallen to second, what of it? They were still in the postseason. Nothin’ to it. Or similarly last year, when the Mets challenged the Braves.

I suppose the wildcard keeps the interest up amongst fans of second-tier teams, of those teams that won’t win 95 games in a season, but might well be able to win 87. And of course, MLB gets a few more bucks from postseason revenues, with the extra round of playoffs. But to me, what’s been lost has been the one thing that truly mattered, the quality of terrible beauty that a prolonged drama can have only if we know there is an inevitable resolution at the end. The regular season was that prolonged drama, but now it resolves little. Those 162 games don’t resolve anything; they’re just an extended weed-out-the-misfits round. They’re now just a series of entertainments, rather than an extended crucible. No team will ever again be tested in the manner that we saw the 1978 Yankees and Red Sox tested, or the 1969 Mets and Cubs, or the 1993 Braves and Giants. And I miss that, in a manner that words can’t convey.

I know it’s of no importance that I used to be a baseball fan, but am one no longer. Bud Selig won’t stop in his tracks and tell the owners that the wildcard experiment is over. It means more money for the owners, so I’m sure it’s here to stay. And whether baseball, as it is now, will do better or worse at attracting a new generation of fans than baseball before 1994, is anyone’s guess. But I feel like a guy whose wife left him years ago, and it’s only now settled in on him that she’s not coming back, and he can only now begin mourning her loss in earnest. Or like a junkie who was forced to go on methadone years ago, but knows every day that it isn’t quite the same thing.

The game may be better or worse with the wild card than without. Like I said, I don’t want to argue that; that’s why this isn’t in GD. But I miss pennant races terribly, and to me, at least, it just isn’t the same game without them.

You miss pennant the race? Did you sleep thru the last month of the 1999 season?
The national league(especially the east) was in a race until damn near the last day of the regular season!
I don’t know about you,but I think last years season was one of THE most exciting seasons I’ve EVER seen.((Been a baseball fan for 30 years)).
It must be the “early baseball season blues”
hitting you.Or a letdown after last years post season anticlimatic World series sweep.


Rich “G7SUBS”

WHAT race? Mets-Braves? The Bravos, at least, were definitely going to the postseason, win or lose. Refer to above. (I guess the Mets coulda blown the wildcard, but I really don’t place that in the same category; if you can’t pull out the wildcard, you don’t belong in the postseason - end of story.)

I’m with you, RTFirefly. As a lifelong Braves fan, I remember the early 90s (gosh, it was so long ago!), staying up late into the night, scouring the papers for the West Coast games, hoping against hope that another team had bested the evil Dodgers and Giants. It mattered then who else won. Now? It’s virtually a lock each year. And it’s boring.

Another thing I miss… the intra- and interdivision rivalries.

What about Cincinnati last year? I think I’m seeing Braves fans getting bored with the rest of the league and season.Might be a case of “getting invited to the Dance,but never actually going”.Maybe the Braves fans think the season is Blase.“Yeah,we’ll go to the playoffs/series…but we won’t win” .


Rich “G7SUBS”

I personally can’t wait for the Braves to blow another Series, but that’s not the complaint. It’s just so… I dunno, unbaseballish to watch it all come down to the wire for the wild card slot, for heaven’s sake.

(I also think that all the stuff RTFirefly said wasn’t part of the debate has a lot to do with how I feel about it, but that’s another thread.)

The NL Central will go down to wire this year, with the Cardinals coming out on top.
The might Yankee’s will fall and the Phillies, not the Mets, will challenge the Braves. The Dodgers wil have it wrapped up by July. You heard it here first!

God, I love Baseball!!!

These complaints about the wild card spots ruining the Penant Race are exactly the same complaints people were making in 1969 when they went to a division playoff format.

I agree that the wild card format takes some of the excitement out of the season, but I also think that the division format took some excitement out. That doesn’t mean the season can’t be exciting… Going down the wire there will still be penant races, teams will want first place, because a division win puts you in a safer spot in the playoffs, and some years losing the top spot will lose a chance at going to the playoffs at all.

Me, my reasons to be not as much a baseball fanatic is the strike that stopped the Series. I could take all kinds of stupidity from the owners and players. (Heck I am a Phillies fan, the birthplace of owner stupidity.) But that strike really cut back on my interest in the game. I have started to become more interested the past two or three years, but, it will be a long time before its back the way it was before, if ever.
pat

While I certainly agree with RTF’s complaints about the devaluing of the regular season and the demise of pennant races (as a Braves fan, I’m particularly fond of remembering '93), are pennant races the only reason for watching baseball?

I consider myself a baseball fan even more than a fan of any particular team. I like the whole experience of going to a game, whether it be at Turner Field, at Engel Stadium in Chattanooga (no more, alas), McCormick Field in Asheville, Ray Winder Field in Little Rock, War Memorial Stadium in Greensboro – I even enjoyed the games I attended in the Astrodome and the Kingdome (though the former was helped by seeing Bob Gibson pitch, and the latter was the worst place to watch a baseball game I’ve ever been in). I’ve driven from Seattle to Tacoma on a rainy Sunday morning on the off chance that they might get a game in (they didn’t, alas). In the immortal words of Humphrey Bogart, “A hot dog at the ball park is better than a steak at the Ritz”.

There’s so much to enjoy in baseball apart from the success of any particular team over the course of a season that it just seems a shame to miss out on it all simply because there’re few if any close races at the end of the season – there’s over 2400 games in the major league season, and most of them are interesting in and of themselves in one way or another, without reference to their effect on the standings.

I’ve enjoyed the Braves’ run of success in the '90s, but there’s a part of me that misses the more relaxed days of the late '80s, just after I moved to Atlanta, when I could walk up at game time and buy a ticket behind the third-base dugout, ten or twelve rows back, for what, $10-$12, and watch the Braves lose to the Cardinals (my first love) in some imaginative new way. I went to 15-20 games a year in those days. Now, those tickets go for $30, and are all gone by opening day, bought for the most part by companies that use them as baksheesh and employee perks, meaning that they often go unused. I only make it to two or three Braves games a year now, making up the difference with minor league games in Chattanooga and Asheville.



“Ain’t no man can avoid being born average, but there ain’t no man got to be common.” –Satchel Paige

rackensack - I don’t think pennant races are the only reason for following baseball, but for me, at least, that’s where the game was at its best. Pennant races made every game (for the teams involved, anyway) matter in a way that apparently will never happen again; it made every step of the progression from 0-0 to, say, 95-67 important.

Ultimately, any spectator sport is about throwing an individual, or a team, into the crucible, and seeing how they do when something’s at stake. (IMO, at least.) That’s what gives the rest of the sport its context. Without that context, I’d rather play in a slow-pitch softball game that doesn’t matter, than watch a ML baseball game that doesn’t matter. And absent that context, there are, for me, a whole bunch of other pursuits that become more compelling than MLB games.

While I’ve been primarily an Orioles fan since the late '70s, I’ve been a fan of the entire game as well. But it certainly lessened my excitement in 96-97, when the O’s made the postseason, that the Yankees ('96) or the Orioles ('97) could blow a passel of games, fall behind the other club by the end of the season, and lose essentially nothing as a result. Instead of ‘Omigod, the Yankees are only 4 games back’, it was ‘who cares - we’re in the playoffs any which way’. When your team does well, and there’s no excitement to it, that says something significant. I mean, what’s the point of hoping that a lightning bolt will strike Peter Angelos, and somebody with a clue will buy the ballclub, if it’s going to taste like tofuburgers when they finally do well?

pricciar - I was already a baseball fan when the game went to divisional play. I didn’t find at the time that it made anything less exciting (we had Mets-Cubs that first year, after all), and (in retrospect, anyway) I think that having two 12-team leagues, rather than four 6-team divisions, just wouldn’t have worked. And, fact is, we had tons of great pennant races in the 25 years of divisional play, as originally sturctured.

Like I said, I’m not a hidebound traditionalist. I liked divisional play (in the 1969-93 format); I like having one DH league, and one non-DH league; I like IL play, although when you’ve got 30 teams, I think MLB has to think about how to make sure some teams play each other enough to have real rivalries, if everyone plays everyone else at some time.

But the wildcard lets too much of the tension out of the 162 games. For me, at least. The pennant races that actually send someone home are in the third-best division, not between the powerhouses. It just isn’t the same.

What kind of freaking alternate baseball universe are you living in? Not a single one of these things is actually going to happen during the 2000 season.

No…I saw it in every sports column in every newspaper.((except for that “yankees will fall” hogwash))


Rich “G7SUBS”

There’s a postseason? I’m sorry - I’m from Philadelphia, and I didn’t realize that. I thought all the players went home immediately after the regular season.

Resevoirdog, I stands by my picks. We’ll talk again in September.