Why is "fear of spiders (snakes, etc)" now something to "brag" about?

Seems to be a recent phenomenon, especially on Facebook. For example, on our neighborhood HOA FB page, occasionally someone will post that they saw a snake, or that the spiders are started to make their webs, or whatever. This is usually followed by responses that consist of some people saying how great they are for the environment, but a lot of people expressing how if they found a snake/spider/etc in their house they’d “torch the house and move.”

Okay, so 1) I get it, it’s exaggeration for humor value, and 2) some people really are scared of spiders and snakes. And nobody is actually going to destroy their house to avoid a spider.

But what I don’t get is, a lot of the biggest responders saying “they’d blow their house up if they saw a spider” are grown men, and often otherwise tough, “manly” men.

So why has it become popular to basically insist that you’re, well, a “wimp”? A “wuss”? Or any other non-“macho” term. I mean, they don’t have to respond at all, after all.

Does anybody else know what I mean? Ideas?

I dunno.

WAG: It’s a way of saying: I’m relatable. I’m human, I have flaws, but not the kind that make me a jerk.

It’s similar to how if you post a picture of a woman with big breasts on a forum now half the comments are people declaring they are sorry for their back problems or how they’ll sag in 10 years.

Why does any of that matter to the picture at hand? We’re you going to run out and marry them up until you saw their big boobs?

This ties into the various “Toxic Masculinity” threads. It’s because men don’t actually care about what “society” tells them they should feel, and it’s okay to say “Fuck spiders!” even if you are a man. The increasing amount of men who say that is their way of pushing back on what TV and Movies tell them to be.

I think there’s a danger of reading too much into stuff like this.

It’s nice to reply to stuff and get involved, and tell a semi-joke at the same time.
Otherwise what are you supposed to reply? “I ain’t fraid o no spiders”?
(actually that would be good response, but you take my point)

Whether a response makes one look less manly has little significance on the internet.

Re: my bold

You must be on a different internet than me. But I agree it really shouldn’t have any significance.

I mean because of anonymity – I’ve admitted to a lot more things online than I would in person.

But also, yeah I don’t really see manliness being a big deal on interwebs. Take this forum for example.
Of course US conservative websites are probably all about that BS, but don’t be under the impression that they represent half of the world’s population or public discourse.

What? I’m failing to see the connection?

You are seeing more people sharing that sort of thing because more people are sharing in general. That’s it. By definition you aren’t going to notice the increased number of people who aren’t sharing that sort of stuff.

Going off topic – but this reminded me irresistibly of the bit in a history of one of World War I’s more obscure campaigns, featuring a wonderful dismissive insult. It involves two British officers of some seniority, who totally failed to hit it off: they were arguing with increasing heat over some point of “what should be done next” – one of the pair totally lost it, and ended up shouting at the other, “Ah, go to hell and commit unnatural offences with spiders !”

If men are saying they’d blow up a house, sounds like they’re ironically using macho threats to exaggerate the lengths they’d go to for their “wimpy” fear of spiders, for humorous effect. Which makes me think they are just joking about all of it.

I’m with the opinion that too much is getting read into that.

Someone somewhere made a joke about nuking a spider or burning down the house, and people just continue it.

I would venture a guess that it is a safe topic so people feel comfortable responding, insofar as no one is going gang up on you and roast you for saying spiders are icky. The same can’t be said for politics, or commenting on women’s attractiveness, or chiming in about vaccinations. So those not looking for arguments stick to topics like spiders, cute cats and the amount of coffee they drink. At least on my FB wall they do.

IMO, the “I don’t kill spiders” attitude is now seen as a Politically Correct & Environmentalist. So the “I hate spiders” is part of the overall anti-PC movement.

It’s like how when Donald Trump said he liked Cinco De Mayo everybody in the world suddenly decided Cinco De Mayo wasn’t a real holiday and no Mexican in history has ever celebrated it.

The backlash had started well before this. Trump’s tweet just confirmed that the poorly based cultural appropriation had maxed out.

This was always going to be a rise-and-fall bit.

What if you kinda like spiders, like I do?

“I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure. “

Because people (in the US at least) are so fearful that it becomes a point of pride. It’s not just spiders and snakes; it’s innocuous things like clowns.

People even seek out ways to be “scared” (it’s often being startled, not scared). Then they brag about how terrified they were.
I find that attitude incomprehensible. Being scared is no fun, and it pisses me off when people try to scare me. But we live in a culture where fear is a point of pride.

I’m not sure that claiming you’ll blow up your house is unmanly - that’s a man’s man’s ‘reasonable tactical response to an invader’.