It completely baffled me. Where on earth is this person coming from? Why on earth would it be “selfish” to adopt instead of trying for a bio-kid?The only other place I’ve encountered a similar attitude is a throwaway line in the web comic “Something Positive”, and I just figured that particular character was insane.
To me (and anyone I’ve ever met) having a child is a deeply selfish act in and of itself, in the sense that you’re only doing it for yourself,and no-body else. Nobody has children to serve some greater good. What possible difference does it make to the world at large whether or not one more person has a bio-kid? So where does this thought that not having bio-children is selfish come from? Does some random person having bio-children have a tangible benefit to everyone else?
I’ve sometimes heard it said that wasting tons of money and time to get a bio-child instead of adopting an already born child is selfish, since your contributing to over-population while there are children already needing homes. I don’t agree with this, but at least it makes some sort of logical sense.
This opposite view? I can’t make heads or tails of it. Is it an American thing? Exactly why is this person supposed to feel selfish?
I agree with you entirely that adopting a kid is one of the least selfish things one can do. As the parent of a bio kid, I can say that there is some bit of selfishness in the decision to have children, as the motivation is to have the experience of being a parent, more or less. The interesting part of that decision, of course, is that being a parent, whether a bio-kid or via adoption, requires you to be extremely unselfish during the raising of that child…at least for me, the whole purpose of my life changed from furthering my own goals to more or less living my life to make my daughter’s life better. Not that I don’t still have personal ambitions…just that the motivation for a lot of that has changed. I now want an improved career both to have more nice things for myself, but primarily to provide security and options for her.
Most people, I think, would heartily agree that adoption is very unselfish, I think the poser of the question is just having conflicting feelings.
Wouldn’t it be more selfish to have a kid? I’m looking at this more in a resource-point of view; the kid(s) you choose to have will take up resources in the world, as we all do as humans, as opposed to not having a kid at all.
People can have children for both selfish and unselfish reasons and they can refrain from having children for both selfish and unselfish reasons. I would even go so far to say that people can adopt children for both selfish and unselfish reasons. Trying to attribute a motive by only observing the outcome is logically flawed.
ETA: Even further, people can do all of those things for a mix of selfish and unselfish reasons. And regardless of their initial motivation, their actions after having the child can also be a mixture of selfishness and unselfishness.
I think that’s a debatable point, really. For the most part people adopt for the same reasons that they have bio-children–because they want children. And I think claiming that adoption is so much more unselfish than biology is a bit patronizing; adoptive parents are not saviors. Adoption is a complex thing with a lot of emotion involved, and it can be painful on both sides as well as happy. That doesn’t mean I disapprove of adoption, but it’s not a simple thing.
The adoption industry is not all rainbows and kittens. I don’t know much about it myself, but there is a dark side as well. Now I think that on the whole the good that happens is more than the bad–but there is bad, and that shouldn’t get ignored.
Agreed. In fact, anything anyone does probably has, at least in part, a “selfish” reason behind it. Avoiding pain, pursuing happiness, helping because of the good feeling you get from altruism - these are all selfish things in that they result in a benefit to you. Certainly people who have, or don’t have, or adopt children are doing it at least partly because they think that choice will add something to their lives. That’s selfish, but it doesn’t make it wrong.
It’s been my experience, as a childless 40 year old, that the people who think I’m selfish for not having kids are usually the ones who got married young because they “had to”, and are just bitter about it.
i concur Harvey… thats why i support gay marriage…nothing annoys me more than two adults together gettin to spend their money on what they want lol…
I have two bio kids and to tell you the truth i didn’t put a lot of thought into having them. As i got older i realized what an impact overpopulation has and other issues… I look at people with 5,6,7,8 kids and I wonder why? I wonder what farm are they workin?? I just don’t think that I can be the same kind of father to 7 as i am to my 2…
I do think with Griswold and the advent of birth control that people need to really think about these issues prior to having children… to some …Children are less thought out than a big screen teevee…
Another reason why i’m happy that MY president has support the UN attempts to allow poor countries to do family planning… When you can get ahold of your population is when u can plan and better serve the needs of the people…
I definitely have gotten that reaction out of people!
On the other hand, because I don’t have kids I have been the child who can put my life on hold for months at a time to care for ill parent(s) so my sisters who do have children can spend their time with their kids. That’s hardly putting myself first now is it?
Yes, because I never had kids I have time, energy and money I could spend on myself… but I don’t always choose to do that.
I think there is also a bit of jealousy going on there, it seems there is an assumption that because I don’t’ have the expense of kids I’m somehow wealthy. (Looks at food stamp card) Nope, I’m not. At least, not at the moment. 'Cause, you know, taking months out of your life to take care of ill relatives can really screw up your career track.
Which I would call only self-interested, which everyone, parent or not, is.
Using this definition of Selfish from Merriam Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/selfish), especially the last part.
1 : concerned excessively or exclusively with oneself : seeking or concentrating on one’s own advantage, pleasure, or well-being without regard for others.
WITHOUT REGARD FOR OTHERS. Who, exactly, is being harmed by someone else’s decision to eschew reproduction, or adopt, or whatever?
I think it largely comes from people who need to see their own choices validated and are afraid their fragile little minds will explode if they come in contact with someone who challenges their assumptions.
Speaking from my own experiences with such Nosy Parkers.