Of course not…it’s the Jews!
What? People like Rupert Murdoch are Marxists? Now you’re just being silly.
I think he is because rootless and ruthless cosmopolitans are the ones who benefit most from this new world order. (Cultural Marxism is not the same as Economic Marxism, thus letting him keep his loads of money)
I… don’t know how to respond to this. Please tell us you’re joking.
Assuming for a moment that your claim that political correctness = cultural marxism actually makes any sense, how does Rupert Murdoch fit in here? Neither he nor the various branches of his media empire are generally considered politically correct.
It was chocking for me too when I first realized it. Check this out: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=13880108&postcount=26
:dubious: “Rootless cosmopolitans”? Where have I heard that before? Are you talking here about the Murdoch media empire, or the House of Rothschild?
Rupert Murdoch. Rupert f***ing Murdoch - the guy who owns Fox News, which stands against liberalism and political correctness. He’s a cultural Marxist by virtue of his anything-but-cultural-Marxist news station?
Political Correctness? Have you seen Fox News AT ALL?
This is just ridiculous. You’re simply labeling people to fit your world view, regardless of whether or not the facts actually fit the label.
Yes, leftists like Robert McCormick dominate the U.S. media. It’s obvious at this point that you know as much about the press as you do about Marxism and immigration, but the other thing you need to realize is that few media barons will let their politics get in the way of making money. That’s their actual position, and it’s about as un-Marxist as it gets.
Why would they do such a thing to keep “typical tall, blue-eyed, blond Swedes” described as “perfect physical specimens, tall as date palms, blonde and ruddy” down you ask? I’m waiting to hear it’s the Jews behind it all.
Never worked in Hollywood, but I was a newspaper reporter once, and I can tell you they’re mostly middle-class centrists with some liberal tendencies. One I met was a Marxist and she was not yet 22, wouldn’t surprise me if she no longer calls herself that. Journalism is indeed a liberal profession, to the extent that playing Jack-the-Giant-Killer and exposing the guilty secrets of the mighty (politicians, businesscritters, labor leaders, religious leaders, whatever) to the light and air is ipso facto “liberal,” but that’s all.
In any case, if what you’re hoping for is for the American people to come around to the idea that the civil rights movement, or race-neutral immigration policies, or anything of the kind is inspired by Marxism, I know that’s not gonna happen, because it’s been tried. The racists kept pounding that same “Communist!” line throughout the '50s and ‘60s – longer, in Jesse Helms’ case – and it lost traction every year and it is never getting it back. We’re immune to that now, we’ve already had the smallpox. For that matter, the name of Marx no longer even scares anybody.
I think this thread is soon to be over. Can we please summarize?
- Northern Europeans would not vote for mass immigration if they had the chance.
- Still the countries of Northern Europeans are flooded with immigrants.
- The media is labeling those who dare to oppose the immigration as xenophobic or racists.
- In Japan, South Korea and Israel, there are no such media or indoctrinating at all, thus leaving their countries ethnically homogenous.
Is this correct?
No, and you haven’t come anywhere close to making a coherent argument to support any of those points, and in fact, they are for the most part provably wrong.
Only if you declare victory and run like a coward fool.
False. They do have the chance. You’re all republics – well, some monarchies, but the kings ain’t gonna meddle on this point.
You need them. Shoulda had more babies.
The media is right. I mean, you’re not even pretending, and I doubt your party in Sweden is even pretending, to make a conceivably race-neutral “Theytukahrjahbz!” economic argument here.
Of course there is. Historically, far more so, Confucians don’t question authority; Israelis do, but live in a constant seige-mentality. The content of the indoctrination might be different.
And safe from the Aussie Peril!
No. None of it is. And you know it is not.
No.
(1) Nobody would “vote” for mass immigration at all. But they may or may not vote for more or less permissive immigration policies, which may or may not result in increased immigration. Wyoming, for example, is currently very welcoming of immigrants, Hispanic or not, to combat a declining population and lack of cheap labor.
(4) What does the media have to do with it at all? As previous posts have illustrated, Japan and South Korea, at least, have had bad experiences with colonizing influences (those self-same “Northern” Europeans at work, actually). In the case of South Korea, it was known as the “Hermit Kingdom” centuries before exposure to Western influence at all. In both cases, some small strides are currently being made to be more accommodating to immigrants, since their own sources of cheap labor have dried up. If anything, there is a culture of indoctrination against immigration. It’s helped created the aforementioned labor issues.
And Israel is hardly ethnically homogenous. Far from it, actually. It’s not even culturally homogenous. Your sources on this are not satisfactory.
Fervently-held belief?
Satire?
We’re through the looking glass, folks.
If the British were as rabidly anti-immigration as you seem to think the BNP would be a far more successful party than it is. Heck, the Tories tried campaigning on the issue a few times in the last decade and failed miserably. No one wants completely open borders but neither do they want “ethnic” quotas.
Enoch Powell had a majority of the Brits supporting him, but the “establishment” sacked him anyway.