Why is it that only Northern Europeans have been programmed to make themselves into a minority?

[asterion]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

You’re seriously going to cite Pat Buchanan on the Holocaust?

[YogSothoth]

@RaleighRally

I think you are making the whole issue way to complicated. It is as simple as the “Political Correctness”-revolution in the 60s. The politicians in North Europe and North America rather wanted to make ethnic suicide than facing the risk of being called a racist by the “Political Correct”-media. If there was a referendum about immigration, the answer would be a clear NO! In Sweden, there was a referendum in the 80s about immigration:

http://translate.google.se/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sjöbo

No, you’re incorrect. There is no worries about Political Correctness because they denied many NW European whites from immigrating. You are falling into the trap of the mainstream media who has fed you stories of brown immigrants coming to America but the reality is that the majority of immigrants are white

[silenus]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war.

So, January of '42?

[BrainGlutton]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

I suppose you remember well enough, your mistake there is in trusting Pat Buchanan. They started laying the groundwork in 1939, and there is no doubt whatsoever as to what they were planning:

The question of the treatment of the Jews became an urgent one for the Nazis after September 1939, when they invaded the western half of Poland, home to about two million Jews. The pre-war Second Polish Republic had been divided between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, in the preceding Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Of the German share of Poland, the north-western parts were annexed, while the south-eastern parts were made the Generalgouvernement, administered by Hans Frank. The invasion led Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, and France to declare war—World War II had started.

Himmler’s right-hand man, Reinhard Heydrich, recommended concentrating all the Polish Jews in ghettos in major cities, where they would be put to work for the German war industry. The ghettos would be in cities located on railway junctions, so that, in Heydrich’s words, “future measures can be accomplished more easily.”[74] During his interrogation in 1961, Adolf Eichmann testified that the expression “future measures” was understood to mean “physical extermination.”[74]

Furthermore, Hitler had already “united” almost all the “scattered Germans” before Churchill came to power. The only “deal” that could have let him take in the rest – Volga Germans in Russia, other Volksdeutsche in Poland and Southeastern Europe – would have been one that gave him a free hand in invading, conquering and annexing all the German-minority countries in Europe – IOW, letting him win, and build his continental Greater Germany on the bones of Poland and Russia. That ain’t no “deal.” That’s just Pat Buchanan’s wet dream.

[Qin_Shi_Huangdi]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

No. Without a war, the Nazis would just have devoted all their resources to the Holocaust unless by a butterfly they accept Himmler’s plan to send them all to Madagascar or something. And at any rate there should have been no deal with Hitler, he’d already waged wars of conquest in Poland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France (where except for Danzig and Alsace-Lorraine there are very few Germans).

[straight_man]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

…so?

(Seriously, even ignoring that you’re wrong, that’s the lamest defense of the Nazis I’ve ever heard.)

[BrainGlutton]

RaleighRally, you are come for.

[Cheshire_Human]

@levdrakon

I’m guessing English isn’t your first language. Or second, or third, or fifteenth.

@Giles

Second language, actually. My first language was baby talk.

And you sucked at it, didn’t you. Admit it! That’s why you switched to English in Pre-K! Right? Right??? See it’s all a plot by the Non-English-speaking Northern Euros! And their off-white immigrant minions! A PLOT, I tell you, a PLOT! We’re all doomed! Well, only us white people, but you get the idea…

[mac_bolan00]

is the OP sure there is no contra- or tangent-force, such as the fact that other enthnicities tend to gravitate towards northern european populations?

[BrainGlutton]

@mac_bolan00

is the OP sure there is no contra- or tangent-force, such as the fact that other enthnicities tend to gravitate towards northern european populations?

“Gravitate” sexually?! If RaleighRally buys that old canard I’m sure it does not reassure him, quite the reverse! That’s how race-mixing happens!

[Dissonance]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

Yes, because Pat Buchanan’s insightful views on WW2 makes him widely acknowledged as a historian of great stature.

Oh wait, no, I meant it’s regarded as the batshit crazy ramblings of an idiot that it is.

[msmith537]

@RaleighRally

@Acsenray You are wrong. The West has never indulged in large scale immigration until the 1950s. It is possible to prosper without importing impoverished people from the third world. Both the West and Japan are examples of this.

Gues you aren’t counting all those Irish who came over during the potato famine. Those screamin’ Chinamen who built the Transcontinental Railroad. Not to mention all dem…ahh.. Negro slaves.

[BrainGlutton]

The Romans prospered by bringing slaves of all known colors from all over the Mediterranean world and beyond to Italy. Today’s Italians are in substantial part their descendants, I suppose. A case against race-mixing, if you look at Italy now. Or for, if you consider where the Renaissance started.

[Dr.Crap]

I like the countries I own to have kebabs.

[ITR_champion]

@RaleighRally

You are wrong.

Anne Neville is correct and you are incorrect. There was a large wave of Polish immigrants to the United States long before the 1950’s. The first ones arrived in the 18th century, it picked up steam in the 19th century, and topped out in the early 20th century, as part of a total of almost ten million immigrants who arrived in the 1900-1910 decade. You keep pointing to the immigration reforms in 1924 but the United States was founded in 1776. Our country put tight controls on immigration for only a very small part of its history. For the most part, we’ve always welcomed immigrants from all over the world.

@RaleighRally

All Northern European descendants have been programmed since early childhood to hate their heritage and strive for making their own ethnicity to a minority within their own country.

This statement is inane. Computers can be programmed; humans cannot be programmed.

[Bridget_Burke]

So, who programmed them? Some group of clever untermenschen? But how could they be so clever as to “program” their betters? Or did they program themselves?

Does not compute.

[BrainGlutton]

@ITR_champion

Anne Neville is correct and you are incorrect. There was a large wave of Polish immigrants to the United States long before the 1950’s. The first ones arrived in the 18th century, it picked up steam in the 19th century, and topped out in the early 20th century, as part of a total of almost ten million immigrants who arrived in the 1900-1910 decade. You keep pointing to the immigration reforms in 1924 but the United States was founded in 1776. Our country put tight controls on immigration for only a very small part of its history. For the most part, we’ve always welcomed immigrants from all over the world.

Pssst! White people (the real ones) are never “immigrants”! Pay attention!

@ITR_champion

This statement is inane. Computers can be programmed; humans cannot be programmed.

And the ITR unit passes the beta test! Next week we ship!

[BrainGlutton]

@Bridget_Burke

So, who programmed them? Some group of clever untermenschen? But how could they be so clever as to “program” their betters? Or did they program themselves?

Does not compute.

Wait, I know this one . . . Starts with a “J” or an “I” or an “H” or something . . .

[Dissonance]

@ITR_champion

This statement is inane. Computers can be programmed; humans cannot be programmed.

You were programmed to say that.

[Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus]

@RaleighRally

As I remember Pat Buchanan, the Nazis didn’t start the death camps until it was obvious that they were going to lose the war. So if Churchill had struck a deal with Hitler, letting him reunite all the scattered Germans, then there would be no Holocaust.

We’re here to fight ignorance, not spread it.

Pat Buchanan is hardly a credible source of information about the Holocaust.