I’m reading a book that takes place in Florida and I like to look at maps while I read about places. I’m surprised that such a large swath of coastline seems to be practically barren. I see a few places like Horseshoe Beach, but given the tourist value of seashore, I’m curious. Is the land so swampy it’s not able to be developed?
I zoom in with Google maps and the satellite view looks like swampy mud more than nice sandy beach like the other side. I assume along with the swamp comes mosquitos, another negative factor. not to mention alligators, snakes, etc.
There’s not really a shore there. Starting from solidly inland the dirt just gets softer & soupier and then 15 miles of swampy mosquitos later the trees stop. Then half a mile later the water gets deep enough to float a ski boat.
One heck of a lot of work went into creating the beaches and barrier islands on the FL east coast. But that was between 70 to 120 years ago and so the current situation there seems natural. Or at least pre-existing.
As long as the more promising and more built-up areas aren’t full, building out that part (NW peninsular coast) of FL isn’t the quickest route to a buck. Which quick route is the sole mantra of the real estate developer mindset.
It’s also incredibly hard to get permitted for that kind of work anymore. That coastline is extremely environmentally sensitive and is protected fiercely. It’s called the Nature Coast for a reason.
I got engaged to my wife during a stay at Cedar Key which is kind of the middle of it. We still go back regularly although it’s gotten beat up pretty hard during the last few hurricane seasons.
I can believe that. On the Pacific coast, the beaches are mostly broad, flat plains. The one Atlantic beach we were on (northern Florida, probably in the general Daytona area) was horizontal for about 50’, then dropped dramatically into the surf. We have not been on other Atlantic beaches, so maybe they are all like that.
Ah, the berm (I live in NE Florida). Often that is an artifact of beach replenishment, and is often not there at all. [fwiw]
If you look at Bing maps, it shows that the majority of it is wildlife management areas, state parks or similar non-developable areas.
Google maps doesn’t show that as well as Bing does, believe it or not.
Thanks for the answers everyone. Makes sense.
Definitely not. I’ve been on beaches from Virginia to Maine, and I don’t think any of them fit that description.
Of course, there are lot with a lotta rocks…