Simple: Same reason the FBI was told to stop. So in fact, the Clintons are lying, thieving tax cheating influence peddlers - not to mention national secuity risks as basically pardoned felons with no concept of protecting sensitive classified information. Evidently.
Fuck anybody who still can’t see through the wool they desperately clutch to their face.
Responses touting the better qualities of Mr. Trump, myself or subjecting anyone or any thing other than the topic to discussion will be categorically ignored.
All pure nonsense. The FBI wasn’t “told to stop”, they didn’t find anything despite being run by a Republican partisan. And the IRS isn’t investigating the Clinton Foundation because it has no reason to.
Take the wool off your own face and maybe you’ll see that you are the only one doing said clinging? I know, I know, you don’t want to/can’t believe that so I am to be ignored.
If you believe you have information that the Clinton Foundation has violated tax laws, you should bring it to the attention of the tax authorities, just as you did when you learned that the Trump Foundation was soliciting money without authorization.
You did report the Trump Foundation, right?
Also, from the posts I’ve seen from you so far, being on your ignore list would be an absolute privilege, so have at it.
It is an opinion piece based on a hacked e-mail from one guy.
It is certainly possible that the Clintons have used contacts, (some developed through the foundation), to get offers to make speeches that have enriched them. However, no one has brought any evidence that the foundation, itself, has done anything wrong. Unlike Trump’s foundation, the Clinton outfit routinely gets high marks from charity watch organizations in the areas of passing most of their donations to the people for whom they have been solicited and in actually achieving the goals set out in their advertising campaigns. In addition, much of the Clinton foundation is not run as a source of revenue, but is based on encouraging donors to submit time, information, labor/services, and goods to those in need rather than simply writing checks to the foundation. it is much more of a clearinghouse for charitable works than a money soliciting operation.
This does not mean that Bill and Hillary have never used the contacts they have made to their own advantage, but that is not a violation of IRS regulations.
What is your idea or definition of a “hacked” email? Would it mean the information contained in the email was inaccurate, forged or otherwise altered in some way? Please explain.
Do you have to work hard to come off as dumb?
The point was that all the claims made are based on a single guy’s claims in a stolen e-mail. That the e-mail is from a hacker means that we have no information regarding the actual conversations in which the guy was engaged. We do not know what other people were saying in response–correcting him, challenging him, pointing out his leaps or lapses in logic, etc. We have no way of gauging how much of his text was just self-inflating self-promotion vs how much of it was an actual recitation of the facts. (And even then, nothing in his e-mail points to actual illegal activity.)
So, noting that the e-mail was hacked indicates that we do not know the context surrounding it and we do not know how much of it was modified by the hacker before being published.
Noting that it was all the words of single person indicates that we do not have any reference to the actual conversations surrounding its text no information regarding how much was posted in jest or in self-promotion.
Your leap from “a Clinton associate wrote a potentially embarrassing memo” to your Trump-like accusations that “something” illegal happened, (even when you are unable to say what) along with your Conspiracy Theories is based on nothing more than your desire to bash Clinton without regard to facts, (even such minor detail facts as citing a law that might have been broken).
