The classic answer to OP:
[QUOTE=Will Rogers]
I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat.
[/QUOTE]
The Democratic Party is a coalition of liberals, moderates and conservatives. Jonathan Chance appears to be a conservative, or so I perceive. I’m an ultra-liberal Democrat. Do I consider J.C. to be a DINO?
Hardly. In fact, let me extend to him a belated welcome to the team. Basically, if you oppose bigotry and dictatorship and embrace empiricism, you are ok with me.
Yep. The party of the Big Tent.
There’s something nicely chaotic about the Democratic Party that is missing from the nice neat orderly Republicans.
When you already know all the answers, there’s no need to debate.
What have you contributed to a debate other than a 75-year-old joke?
I’m curious how you interpreted my 2nd comment, and also whether you think Rogers’ comment applies to today’s party.
Mr. Mapcase didn’t answer my follow-on query, so I’m not sure where his confusion lies.
I think my short Rogers quip addressed OP’s question perfectly. Sorry if it was humorous. BigAppleBucky connected the dots. Exapno Mapcase couldn’t. Others?
Or perhaps Mr. Mapcase thought my one-sentence but snarky description of modern Republicans was snark somehow directed at BigAppleBucky. Apologies if anyone else was confused.
Sorry that I didn’t wake up in the middle of the night to reply to this urgent post. Had I but known.
In my state of confusion I somehow leaped to the conclusion that a snarky comment made when quoting BigAppleBucky was aimed at BigAppleBucky. And missed the obvious fact that a comment made with no reference to Republicans must necessarily refer to Republicans.
What foolishness.
In Canada, you hear more about Red Tories than Blue Grits as well. In my experience, anyways.