[QUOTE=Subway Prophet]
Wow, lots of replies, thanks! 
I was thinking about banana leaves, actually, as well as palm leaves. Plenty o’ fiber in them, and since they’re tropical plants, they can be harvested pretty much year round.
Another possibility I was thinking of is corn (maize) husks and stalks. The US generates a huge amount of corn each year; I would imagine that there is a lot of waste from the parts of the plant that don’t end up in the bag of chips.
[/QUOTE]
Other people have already mentioned the unsuitability of the fibers found in leaves for papermaking purposes. Corn husks and stalks, called corn stover, does have some possibilities for papermaking uses, as does sugar cane waste, and some other annual plants, commonly called bagasse.
I’ve done some chemical analysis of some annual fibers. What you want for good paper is a lot cellulose, a glucose polymer. Hemicelluloses, formed of arabinose, galactose, xylose, and mannose, are less desirable, and most of them are lost in conventional pulping processes. Annual plants are pretty high in hemicelluloses for good yields, but as wood prices increase, do start to look more feasible.
The big issue is year round availability. Building a large greenfield pulp and paper mill would cost in excess of a billion dollars, and no one is building small paper mills these days. It takes the nearly the same labor cost to run a 3,000 ton per day mill as a 1,000 ton per day one, so the economy of scale makes 1,000,000 ton per year mills more attractive.
With wood, approximately 50% of the weight of the wood coming in is water, and 50% of the weight of what’s left is lignin, which you’ve got to get rid of, so you’ve got to bring 4,000,000 tons of wood in per year to make 1,000,000 tons of paper. Bagasse has a lower yield and higher water content than wood, so assume 6,000,000 tons of bagasse per year.
Okay, say for instance you’ve got 6,000,000 tons of bagasse. That’s the corn stover production of Wisconsin. But corn stover is only available at harvest, in the fall. You’ve got to be able to store the supply for the entire year, and store it in a way that won’t allow the cellulose that is present to degrade.
I don’t have bulk density numbers on hand for corn stover, but I doubt that it’s denser than wood chips, which average around 11 pounds dry weight/cubic foot. At that density you’re talking about cube of plant waste over 1,000 feet on a side. At it’s angle of repose it’s going to have a much bigger footprint, I don’t know exactly how much bigger, but it’s going to be big.
Add to this that the per dry ton harvesting, baling, and delivery costs for corn stover approach that of wood, and corn is not a reasonable supply of fiber.
The same goes for hemp, by the way. Put down that hacky-sack and pay attention, you damn hippies.