An unprecedented decade-long study of intercessory prayer that cost $2.4 million and was directed by Dr. Herbert Benson, a cardiologist at the Harvard University Medical School, has now reported in.
It was the most comprehensive study ever of the effects of intercessory prayer on the health and recovery of 1,802 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery in six different hospitals.
The 1,802 patients were divided into three groups, two of which were prayed for by religious believers in three congregations: a monastery in Minnesota, a community of Carmelites in Massachusetts and a prayer Ministry near Kansas City.
The prayer groups were instructed to ask for “a successful surgery with a quick, healthy recovery and no complications.”
Prayers began the eve of surgery and went on for two weeks, for each patient.
The results, published, in the American Heart Journal showed that the prayers had no effect. There was no significant statistical difference between the groups. The unprayed-for receovered as well as the prayed-for.
It is worth noting that Dr. Benson, far from being a flaming atheist, has long been sympathetic to the possibility that prayer can influence the health of patients.
This study is FAR MORE complete and scientifically valid than a series of highly dubious studies that grabbed media attention in the past couple of decades.
The other studies, all of which were flawed in methodology or in manner of drawing conclusions, were warmly received by religious believers because they seemed to show a link between prayer and recovery.
All of a sudden, though, religious believers are now denying that something like prayer can or should be scientifically studied. Funny how that works!
But perhaps, they have a point. Perhaps prayer cannot be studied scientifically because it makes no logical sense.
Consider:
If God is omniscient and loves humanity, why does he need to be reminded or pleaded with to heal somebody? Does he not know they are sick? Does he not know that their loved ones want them to get better?
Why do we have to come pleading to him as if he were some oriental monarch on his throne?
The idea of prayer, that asking God to grant something increases the chances of that thing happening, is unfalsifiable.
In science, an assertion must be fasifiable. For example, if we started finding the bones of prehistoric rabbits in the pre-cambrian depositis, that would falsify evolution, or at least an incredibly large chunk of it.
How can prayer ever be fasifiable? If you get what you prayed for, it allegedly proves prayer works. If you do not get it, it means that God knows better or does not think you should have that now, or whatever.
Finally, consider this. Either there is or there is not a God, right? But if there is no God, is it not logical to suppose that some people would feel a need to comfort themselves by asking that non-existent being for what they need? Would you not logically expect these people to protect their comforting illusion with the unfalsifiable and unchallengeable reasoning described above?
Does that not seem to be exactly what is happening here on earth? You are speaking into a dead phone line, folks.