my friend wants to know
From Wikipedia: Ruby v. Texas
So it ws not so much an overturning, in the colloquial sense of “his conviction was overturned and he was set free,” as it was a finding that he did not receive a fair trial under the circumstances, so the conviction was overturned and he was remanded for a new, fair trial. (Which he died prior to receiving.)
I wonder if change of venues were common back then? I know they’re done today, but even still there hard to get in this day and age, with the Internet and everyone having access to news from all over
I’m not sure that access to news is the relevant factor, but rather the strength of local feeling in a community or in some cases the racial makeup, if race is a factor in the crime charged.