And Google says:
**Results 1 - 10 of about 348 for goat tits 36DD. (0.50 seconds) **
Or “Quizno’s.”
From what I’ve noticed the problem isn’t with how people find information it’s that some people don’t even look before they ask. I’ll give anyone credit for some intelligence if they make any effort to learn. I know too many people who just believe anything they hear in the lunchroom or can’t read the back of a package for instructions.
Try Googling for the official rules of a bean bag game traditionally called “corn hole game”. There’s no way to advance search the porn out of that one.
No, not the case at all.
If you type in “mature gay goat porn” you will still get teen hetero lizard porn. Every single porn page out there has as its META tag every possible permutation of every conceivable fetish. No matter what you type, you will still get the same top 10 results. Honestly, try searching for “tiny titty porn.” Guaranteed the first 5 sites you get will feature girls with humongous jugs.
Or so I am told. I do not speak from experience here. And if you don’t believe me, ask my mature gay goat.
Type the following: “corn hole game” -porn
Seems to do the trick.
For some questions, I’d rather get a paragraph-long, consice explaination, rather than wading through god knows how much goat porn. This is especially true when I want layman’s terms for a relatively complex subject.
No matter how good at searching people get, you will still get stupid questions in GQ. Many ignorant questions will still be asked by people with some degree of ignorance. It is our responsibility to fight these people. Says so right in the masthead.
Yes, I’m joking about that last part.
I have noticed the following pattern oft repeats: google a topic, and the first 10-15 cites are good ones, and then a sharp drop off into major chaff, meta-tag-nonsense-piles, etc…
and yet, maybe 2-3 pages later, the quality of the hits seems to increase again. On a few occasions I have found viable hits in the #60-#70 range. (and seen a lot of oddball entries besides…)
I had a lot of fun at work trying to find sources for “industrial vibrators” (pneumatically powered fixtures that shake the sides of silos and bins to prevent stuff sticking to the bin walls).
There’s no need to use that fancy “-porn” nvestigator.
This works just fine:
Results 1 - 5 of 5 for bean bag “corn hole game”. (0.26 seconds)
Well, duh… next time I’ll check before I say anything. I do always forget to use the minus feature. Last summer when I searched “corn hole game” I had to close the screen before my son read anything.
Anyway, it’s a fun game
Just for the edification of the masses no goat porn in the first 30 pages of google. The closest was a page 11 news story about an Indonesian guy who raped 5 goats to death. Yes, I’m bored today.
Thought that’s what on-line friends were for?..Steering you clear of those potholes and stepping on the brakes when you’re about to crash? Guess not, but in any case, it’s all a heck of a lot more fun than any driver’s ed class I ever had. Hell I came from a rural area where they told me to avoid the goats and the sheep and even the wolves in sheep’s clothing.
You know, for Google you can also turn on the SafeSearch feature, which supposedly filters out the adult content.
I hope you’re a lot less bored than the Indonesian guy must have been.
They play The Corn Hole Game in Indonesia?
Can we just get back to bitching about people that don’t look up anything on their own?
Besides using one word searches, people don’t put any thought into the search when they do one.
I find most of what I need with just the brainpower of a small appliance bulb (when I’m at work, that’s the best I can do).
I type the subject and FAQ together and get good results just from that mindless effort. e.g. In an GQ thread about mussels, I typed in “mussels faq” and got at least five pages from mussel farmers about the very topic in GQ.