Of course you try to seize on this historical fact to make a distortion to cover your ignorance and make a straw man to imply I am making a conspiracy argument.
You pretend of course that I have not already mentioned discrimination and impoverishment as reasons, and you try to distort what I have written by taking this out of context to cover your ignorance and
However, there was a very real and substantial effort that is quite documented by theMossad to promote immigrationspecifically from Morocco as the deep source of Jewish population. It is not even controversial, the operation is quite known and claimed with pride.
Again of course I did not write this was THE reason, only it was contribution.
No, I will say that you are repeating exagerations and propaganda from dubious and deeply prejudiced sources you have lapped up in English wihtout having any direct sense from reliable sources.
You are much attached to your pretensions of knowledge of the region.
I cited to the source as an illustration that even a biased source admits that there was no ethnic cleansing in Morocco.
In fact one can find in the French sources which is less subject to the American centric extremist propoganda very reasonable discussions of the exodus of the Moroc
It is the same observation as the famous author David Bensoussan who wrotes in responding to Jew of Morocco(that is in French, Juif du Maroc, a blog by a Jewish resident of Casablanca) blog
All this is to confirm the case that your distortions are not historical. The Jewish case of Morocco is well diferrent than that of those of the Mashrek. It is not to say no discrimination and no problems.
It is only to emphasize again that to pretend the case of Morocco was “ethnic cleansing” or comparable to the cases of the Mashrek countries is to make gross distortions that are falsehoods and propaganda.
The Jewish population of Morocco had good reason to profit in immigration to better their lives, but it was not in the face of the violences and goverment terror and backed cleansing like in the Iraq, like in the Egypt, in the Libye etc…
You have previously argue that sources which are “Jewish” and “anglophone” aren’t to be trusted.
You also are now declaring “Americacentric” sources aren’t to be trusted.
Why do you think pew polls aren’t to be trusted?
Do you think the people running Pew are “Zionists” of some sort?
Please tell me why polls showing high levels of anti-Semitism in Morocco(88% of all Moroccans say they disapprove of Jews) are untrustworthy?
Also, when it was pointed out that the first source you posted supported your contention that Jews started fleeing in massive numbers you started declaring without posting any evidence, that it was inaccurate?
Did you read it?
I also said nothing nothing about them being the victims of “government backed terror”.
Is your position that Palestinian Arabs who fled after hearing of the Dir Yassin massacre aren’t victims of ethnic cleansing because the Hagannah didn’t back it?
Anyway, this is a really pointless argument and off-topic but when virtually an entire community flees because they face bigotry and persecution to claim it’s not ethnic cleansing is massively pedantic.
At least the Israeli apologists who insist that the Naqba wasn’t a result of ethnic cleansing can point to there being more Arab Israelis now living in Israel than at the time before the Naqba.
I am no longer playing the pedantry straw man games.
I have never argued such a thing at all, this is a gross distortion and a false claim although it is no surpise to see you do this.
no I did not. I said that certain kinds of biased american centric sources can not be trusted for this subject matter. Not “american centric sources”
You deliberately distort to distract.
Do you think that playing word games with Zionist you make an argument?
I know well you want to try to distort and to paint me as in your stereotype of Muslim arab paranoide anti-semite as your strawman to argue against.
I respond to your adjectives of virulence and the characterisations you make, not Pew polls . I am not playing your word games any further, the idea that morocco is so virulent is quite laughable when one knows the country in reality and does not rely on second hand proganda. It is the sole country in the arabe region to have a state museum to its Jewish heritage and where the historical and the living jewish centres are maintained with state funds and where Muslim and Jew attend the popular Jewish moussems, and where the economic elite is significantly Jewish as well. it is a strange ‘ethnic cleansing’ coutnry where the elite economic class remained undespoiled and grew even wealthier.
It is sufficient that anyone can read in translation of the sources that the claim of ethnic cleansing of Jews in Morocco is false and gross distortion of the history, and the history of Morocco in this area is very starkly diffreent from those of the Mashrek. You can not of course admit error, it is known that, so you must attack the messanger.
The point I make is simple, the Jewish history in Morocco of the post-colonial period is radically different from the rest of the region and while it can not be made too rosy, it was not rosy, it is no way like that of the East and you made a mistake in comparing the Iraq with the Moroccan experience.
Er… I wasn’t aware you were an Arab or Muslim so this is false.
Beyond that, you seem now to be claimed that because there are a few thousand Jews left that it couldn’t have been ethnic cleansing.
You’re aware that following ethnic cleansing of Armenians from Anatolia there were not just a few thousand Armenians left but there were 100,000 left and they were living in Constantinople at the heart of the Ottoman Empire and most were part of the economic elite which is why the Ottomans made a point of keeping and pandering to them.
Based on your logic I shouldn’t call it an ethnic cleansing.
Is that your view because if you want to be logically consistent it should be?
I’d be careful voicing such thought because doing so in your country is a crime.
Sorry, but the Jewish population of Morocco according to your own sources dropped from 280,000 to just a few thousand due to bigotry. Just because the government of Morocco tried to stop this from happening doesn’t deny the reality.
You have yet to explain why you quote from that source only to now insist it’s not to be trusted when it contradicts your claims
I also did not compare the Iraqi and Moroccan governments. I made an offhand remark about Iraqi and Moroccan Jews who both fled to Israel due to anti-Semitism which you’ve blown out of proportion.
To make the false comparison clear here we can draw on this history (PDF) with the academic citations to proper neutral professional histories (notably taking fromMichel Abitbol histories) and compare the events
Irak
Egypt
As we compare to Morocco
It is clear in this serious history comparison that
It is also clear that all things I have posted have fully supported my point that there is no legitimate place to state ethnic cleansing occurred in Morocco as the serious Jewish and Israeli historical sources are clear about. You of course have no capacity to admit error or step away from know-all positions made from limited knowledge much exagerated (as your snide remarks about Mossad show yet).
Sometimes I have to wonder why Jews want to live in Isreal at all?
Jews live in many areas of the world and often do just fine there. Now yes, technically the “homeland” for the Jews is Palestine but that was over 2,000 years ago and who says Jews cannot live out their cultural and religious beliefs from say China, France, Argentina, Mexico, Hawaii, Antarctica, or Brooklyn?
What makes you think there aren’t Jews living in Brooklyn?
As for the rest - Jews live in Israel now for much the same reason anyone lives anywhere - because that’s where they live.
If you are asking “why did they, or their ancestors, move there”, the reason is that historically, it was a good idea or they didn’t have much choice - most Jews moved to Israel from Europe or the Middle East, having either been massacred, turfed out, or threatened with being massacred or turfed out. Moving to a country where they were (a) welcome and (b) had an army willing to protect them from being massacred or turfed out again, seemed to be a good idea. Many of them could not move to wherever they wanted, either because other countries would not take them, or because they had no money.
It is interesting that no-one ever asks why Arabs do not simply move to Antarctica.