Will "BHENGAZI-GATE" screw up Hitlery's chances in 2016?

The latest “theory” is that Stevens was in Benghazi to buy back some Stinger missiles that Hillary had given to al-Qaeda—over CIA objections, mind you—in order to overthrow Gaddafi. :eek:

http://nation.foxnews.com/benghazi/2013/05/21/new-benghazi-whistle-blowers-making-devastating-new-claim#ixzz2TvsU9JPS

Do you think the spontaneous demonstration, the crowd, and the protests mentioned as occurring at the Consulate in Benghazi prior to an attack by ‘extremists’ in the Talking Points was not the consensus of the CIA and Intelligence Community?
Is that what you believe?
Tell me that is what you believe… so I can show that you are wrong.

No one outside the CIA put those words in there in the original draft that was completed by the CIA at 4:42 PM on September 14, 2012 according to the emails.

If you have other facts … let see them.

I have posted the relevant parts of Obama’s Speech to the UN.

The attack on our embassy in Cairo and others was sparked by the video.

So your assignment is to find in Obama’s speech where he blamed the video for the attack on the CONSULATE at Benghazi.

You know, NotfooledbyW, as much as I appreciate a fact-based smackdown of stupidheads, this wall-of-text thing really has to stop. Quote the money shot and link to the rest, if only for the sake of my scrolling finger.

The real scandal in that speech was his blatant attack on the 1st amendment. Slander of Christianity and Jesus is just a normal part of our pop culture. and it’s a GOOD thing. Slander of Mohammed and Islam should also be just as mainstream.

Mind if we call you “Stretch”? You’re full of shit, Stretch.

“The future will not belong to those who slander the prophet Mohammed?” Pander much?

If only our troops had travelled to Benghazi on adaher’s goalposts - nothing else on Earth moves faster and farther.

Hey, I’m just glad to live in a society where liberals are suddenly deeply respectful of people of faith. I expect that SDMB will soon start enforcing anti-blasphemy rules. SDMB wants to inherit the future, doesn’t it?

Blatant selective interpretation of facts? Check.
Ridiculous liberal strawman? Check.
Smug implication of a “gotcha” despite no basis in reality? Check.

Man, I’ve got to make up some bingo cards.

Hey, I’m just getting with the spirit and tone that you’ve helped create here. It is the Pit after all, we can alternate serious discussion with potshots at each other.

Mostly we seem to be alternating you posting what the latest “real” scandal is and the rest of us providing the internet messageboard equivalent of the “sad trombone” riff as the newest scandal turns out to either be based entirely on falsehoods or on a gross exaggeration of the significance of inconsequential minutiae.

But do keep shovelling horseshit. I’m sure there’s a pony in that barn somewhere.

Wait, I thought the real scandal was the changing of the talking points.

Or is it that we didn’t go in hot the second we heard Americans were under fire?

Or is it that Obama called it an act of terror instead of a terrorist attack?

This “throw everything you can think of at the wall and hope something sticks” approach to politics is the reason nobody takes the Republican party seriously anymore.

The real scandal is that the polls are skewed.

In the Republicans’ eyes the real scandal is that they can’t identify a real scandal.

Do shut up you goalpost moving toad-licker.

If you believe Democrats, there has never been a real scandal that a Democratic President has been responsible for.

Unless Obama cuts Social Security. Then everything Republicans ever said about him was right.

Bingo!

If you believe Republicans, anything and everything a Democratic president does is a scandal.

“He bowed to a foreign dignitary!”
“He had the Marines hold an umbrella for him!”
“He orders his burgers with Dijon mustard!”

Is it any surprise that our response when your lot cook up a new scandal is to roll our eyes and move on?

More fun and games: Darrell Issa was informed several times throughout the past year about the IRS investigation into conservative groups.

Honestly, will any of these scandals not bite the Republicans on the ass at some point?